| Re: Coping With The New CAFE Standards, leotard78sp whines again.. [message #794748] |
Mon, 18 February 2008 18:07 |
|
On Feb 18, 3:36=A0pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just... [at] ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "N8N" <njna... [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Thus proving yet again that you're an idiot. =A0A well set up Stude is a=
> > perfectly capable vehicle.
>
> =A0 Capable of wastefully consuming fuel and sucking money out of the owne=
rs
> pockets and into the car companies pockets.
Mmm-hmm.
Please explain which car company sucked the money out of my pocket.
Please also explain why I should waste more energy by buying a new car
that will need to be built by someone when there's a perfectly good
car that's already built that I just have to maintain. (you do know
that a quite significant amount of fuel that is "used" by a motor
vehicle over its life is used in production, not operation, yes?)
gawd, you don't even make sense anymore. Time to get your meds
checked.
nate
|
|
|
| Re: Coping With The New CAFE Standards, leotard78sp whines again.. [message #794753 ] |
Mon, 18 February 2008 22:41 |
|
"N8N" <njnagel [at] hotmail.com> wrote
> Please explain which car company sucked the money out of my pocket.
Sounds like all of em. You just aren't bright enough to know it.
I'm tired of mindless, know nothing gear heads making excuses for being
caught being fucked up the ass by Auto companies.
You must love the buggery.
|
|
|
| Re: Coping With The New CAFE Standards, leotard78sp whines again.. [message #794774 ] |
Mon, 18 February 2008 22:06 |
|
N8N <njnagel [at] hotmail.com> used a stick in the sand to babble
>> Capable of wastefully consuming fuel and sucking money out of the owners
>> pockets and into the car companies pockets.
>
>Mmm-hmm.
>
>Please explain which car company sucked the money out of my pocket.
>Please also explain why I should waste more energy by buying a new car
>that will need to be built by someone when there's a perfectly good
>car that's already built that I just have to maintain. (you do know
>that a quite significant amount of fuel that is "used" by a motor
>vehicle over its life is used in production, not operation, yes?)
Not as much as would be saved by purchasing a state of the art
vehicle. Don't get me wrong, there's nothing more green than the fine
art of recycling and those who maintain and use older classics make a
special contribution to history, but unless that '58 Desoto has a
modern high efficiency, low emissions powertrain, the fuel consumption
difference in using older, less efficient power way offsets any
petroleum used to create a new car which, btw, also creates jobs.
Btw, got any pics of that machine. Imo, Studebaker was one of the
most innovative car companies in American history. Avanti's are still
sleek, modern and in production and that's a half century old design
job!
Swill
--
THIS is how we have to win the Iraq War
http://www.wheelchairsforiraqikids.com/
|
|
|
