| Re: Coping With The New CAFÉ Standards OR Defying the Laws of Physics [message #793296] |
Wed, 06 February 2008 09:46 |
|
"Nate Nagel" <njnagel [at] roosters.net> wrote
> force is actually irrelevant. what is important is the deceleration in
> g's experienced by the passengers. therefore the size of the crush zone
> is important, while mass is unimportant other than in multi-car incidents.
You ain't gonna decellerate without the application of a force. Moron.
Force isn't important. Ahahahahahahahah....
|
|
|
| Re: Coping With The New CAFÉ Standards OR Defying the Laws of Physics [message #793347 ] |
Wed, 06 February 2008 22:00 |
|
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
> "Nate Nagel" <njnagel [at] roosters.net> wrote
>
>>force is actually irrelevant. what is important is the deceleration in
>>g's experienced by the passengers. therefore the size of the crush zone
>>is important, while mass is unimportant other than in multi-car incidents.
>
>
> You ain't gonna decellerate without the application of a force. Moron.
>
> Force isn't important. Ahahahahahahahah....
At the risk of sounding like Lloyd.... learn some physics, fuckstain.
When you don't understand basic Newtonian concepts and the significance
thereof, you sound like... well... you.
nate
--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
|
|
|
| Re: Coping With The New CAFÉ Standards OR Defying the Laws of Physics [message #793359 ] |
Thu, 07 February 2008 01:26 |
|
>> You ain't gonna decellerate without the application of a force. Moron.
"Nate Nagel" <njnagel [at] roosters.net> wrote
> At the risk of sounding like Lloyd.... learn some physics, fuckstain.
Ahahahahahaha... Acceleration without force.
What's next for you man. Proposing moving without motion?
Moooooooooorrrrrrrrrrroooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnn
|
|
|
| Re: Coping With The New CAFÉ Standards OR Defying the Laws of Physics [message #793364 ] |
Thu, 07 February 2008 01:32 |
|
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>> You ain't gonna decellerate without the application of a force. Moron.
>
>
> "Nate Nagel" <njnagel [at] roosters.net> wrote
>
>>At the risk of sounding like Lloyd.... learn some physics, fuckstain.
>
>
> Ahahahahahaha... Acceleration without force.
>
> What's next for you man. Proposing moving without motion?
>
> Moooooooooorrrrrrrrrrroooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnn
>
Hey fuckwit, force is not what is dangerous, it's acceleration. I can
apply all the *force* I want to you, but if properly distributed it
won't hurt (well, permanently) until I apply so much that I start
breaking bones etc.
I can apply a lot less force, but if I accelerate your head enough,
you'll die.
get it yet?
moron, indeed.
nate
--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
|
|
|
| Re: Coping With The New CAFÉ Standards OR Defying the Laws of Physics [message #793374 ] |
Thu, 07 February 2008 02:58 |
|
> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>>> You ain't gonna decellerate without the application of a force. Moron.
>>
>>
>> "Nate Nagel" <njnagel [at] roosters.net> wrote
>>
>>>At the risk of sounding like Lloyd.... learn some physics, fuckstain.
>>
>>
>> Ahahahahahaha... Acceleration without force.
>>
>> What's next for you man. Proposing moving without motion?
>>
>> Moooooooooorrrrrrrrrrroooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnn
"Nate Nagel" <njnagel [at] roosters.net> wrote
> Hey fuckwit, force is not what is dangerous, it's acceleration. I can
> apply all the *force* I want to you, but if properly distributed it won't
> hurt (well, permanently) until I apply so much that I start breaking bones
> etc.
And now the moron confuses force and pressure.
He's a scientsit of course, and for proof he offers a reference to Popular
Science.
Ahahahahahahahahahah............
MOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOONNNNNNNNN nate.
<It's not force that matters in a collision - it's acceleration.> - Nate.
Ahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
