| technical trans shit [message #778528] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 23:56 |
|
OK here comes technical
Anybody have access to rubber mounted transmissions ?
I would like to know if there is a difference in OD size of the part where
the pivot bolt goes through the case.
My 99 calls for a 5/8" pivot shaft and the 2006 calls for a 3/4" pivot shaft
..
Question is - did HD just ream out the hole to accept the larger shaft ? or
did they recast later models -01 and up - with more meat on them ?
Shirley a round for those that aint measurin right now , but doubles for em
when they get done measurin.
Appreciate your help
--
Kickstart AH #127 the" careful" Asshole(tm)
SENS BS182 DOF2 NS2 TL2
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778622 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 13:00 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:56:52 GMT, "Kickstart"
<cwalker7773 [at] tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>OK here comes technical
>Anybody have access to rubber mounted transmissions ?
>I would like to know if there is a difference in OD size of the part where
>the pivot bolt goes through the case.
>My 99 calls for a 5/8" pivot shaft and the 2006 calls for a 3/4" pivot shaft
>.
>Question is - did HD just ream out the hole to accept the larger shaft ? or
>did they recast later models -01 and up - with more meat on them ?
>Shirley a round for those that aint measurin right now , but doubles for em
>when they get done measurin.
>Appreciate your help
Seems to me that if they re-cast it, there'd be an update of the part
number, no?
--
Old Crow
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
"There's only 1 RE"
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778627 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 14:20 |
|
"Old Crow" <walliscrow [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:u8ueb2p8vjtloaa5mon0rmo36aklt0tc0c [at] 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:56:52 GMT, "Kickstart"
> <cwalker7773 [at] tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>OK here comes technical
>>Anybody have access to rubber mounted transmissions ?
>>I would like to know if there is a difference in OD size of the part where
>>the pivot bolt goes through the case.
>>My 99 calls for a 5/8" pivot shaft and the 2006 calls for a 3/4" pivot
>>shaft
>>.
>>Question is - did HD just ream out the hole to accept the larger shaft ?
>>or
>>did they recast later models -01 and up - with more meat on them ?
>>Shirley a round for those that aint measurin right now , but doubles for
>>em
>>when they get done measurin.
>>Appreciate your help
>
> Seems to me that if they re-cast it, there'd be an update of the part
> number, no?
> --
> Old Crow
> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
> "There's only 1 RE"
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
Yes but even if they just machined the hole larger it would have a different
part number as well.
diablo
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778634 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 13:42 |
|
> Seems to me that if they re-cast it, there'd be an update of the part
> number, no?
> --
> Old Crow
If there is a new part number for trans pre 01 from later models.
Fact is the shaft wont fit. 5/8" vs. 3/4"
Ill check with HD about parts #'s on cases, maybe even aftermarket ?
The other difference is a cable drive speedo - pre 2000 and an electronic
speedo, so I cant find out from online catalogues , so far anyway
kickstart
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778755 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 00:06 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778756 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 00:07 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778758 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 00:30 |
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:07:35 -0400, me [at] nopam.com wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:20:12 -0400, "diablo" <nomail [at] spam.not> wrote:
>>
>>"Old Crow" <walliscrow [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:u8ueb2p8vjtloaa5mon0rmo36aklt0tc0c [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:56:52 GMT, "Kickstart"
>>> <cwalker7773 [at] tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>OK here comes technical
>>>>Anybody have access to rubber mounted transmissions ?
>>>>I would like to know if there is a difference in OD size of the part where
>>>>the pivot bolt goes through the case.
>>>>My 99 calls for a 5/8" pivot shaft and the 2006 calls for a 3/4" pivot
>>>>shaft
>>>>.
>>>>Question is - did HD just ream out the hole to accept the larger shaft ?
>>>>or
>>>>did they recast later models -01 and up - with more meat on them ?
>>>>Shirley a round for those that aint measurin right now , but doubles for
>>>>em
>>>>when they get done measurin.
>>>>Appreciate your help
>>>
>>> Seems to me that if they re-cast it, there'd be an update of the part
>>> number, no?
>>> --
>>> Old Crow
>>> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
>>> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
>>> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>>> "There's only 1 RE"
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>Yes but even if they just machined the hole larger it would have a different
>>part number as well.
>
>Not if they retooled for the existing cases
And that right there is th' brazilion dollah question... is th' old
casting beefy enough to drill it out for th' larger sized swing arm
bolt???
I seriously doubt H-D *knew* they were gonna do this design change a
dozen er so years in advance and beefed it up accordingly. Fuckin'
bean counters wouldn't be goin' for that kinda action.
I don't wanna see m' Brother Danny doin' th' sideways boogie down th'
freeway at 80 mph because that fucker failed due to not bein' able to
withstand th' stress after material was removed to accept th' larger
OD bolt.
Snarl
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778764 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 01:12 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778768 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 01:25 |
|
<me [at] nopam.com> wrote in message
news:sb5gb2d93ddrfu0nv5fp3vp4l063s4g358 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:20:12 -0400, "diablo" <nomail [at] spam.not> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Old Crow" <walliscrow [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:u8ueb2p8vjtloaa5mon0rmo36aklt0tc0c [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:56:52 GMT, "Kickstart"
>>> <cwalker7773 [at] tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>OK here comes technical
>>>>Anybody have access to rubber mounted transmissions ?
>>>>I would like to know if there is a difference in OD size of the part
>>>>where
>>>>the pivot bolt goes through the case.
>>>>My 99 calls for a 5/8" pivot shaft and the 2006 calls for a 3/4" pivot
>>>>shaft
>>>>.
>>>>Question is - did HD just ream out the hole to accept the larger shaft
>>>>?
>>>>or
>>>>did they recast later models -01 and up - with more meat on them ?
>>>>Shirley a round for those that aint measurin right now , but doubles for
>>>>em
>>>>when they get done measurin.
>>>>Appreciate your help
>>>
>>> Seems to me that if they re-cast it, there'd be an update of the part
>>> number, no?
>>> --
>>> Old Crow
>>> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
>>> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
>>> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
>>> "There's only 1 RE"
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>>
>>
>>Yes but even if they just machined the hole larger it would have a
>>different
>>part number as well.
>
> Not if they retooled for the existing cases
>
>
If they don't change the part number then which case do you get when you
order that part number? The one with the 5/8" hole or the one with the 3/4"
hole? They need two part numbers to be able to service two different parts
for replacement.
diablo
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778783 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 02:43 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: technical trans shit [message #778798 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 04:00 |
|
diablo wrote:
> <me [at] nopam.com> wrote in message
> news:sb5gb2d93ddrfu0nv5fp3vp4l063s4g358 [at] 4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:20:12 -0400, "diablo" <nomail [at] spam.not> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Old Crow" <walliscrow [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:u8ueb2p8vjtloaa5mon0rmo36aklt0tc0c [at] 4ax.com...
> >>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:56:52 GMT, "Kickstart"
> >>> <cwalker7773 [at] tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>OK here comes technical
> >>>>Anybody have access to rubber mounted transmissions ?
> >>>>I would like to know if there is a difference in OD size of the part
> >>>>where
> >>>>the pivot bolt goes through the case.
> >>>>My 99 calls for a 5/8" pivot shaft and the 2006 calls for a 3/4" pivot
> >>>>shaft
> >>>>.
> >>>>Question is - did HD just ream out the hole to accept the larger shaft
> >>>>?
> >>>>or
> >>>>did they recast later models -01 and up - with more meat on them ?
> >>>>Shirley a round for those that aint measurin right now , but doubles for
> >>>>em
> >>>>when they get done measurin.
> >>>>Appreciate your help
> >>>
> >>> Seems to me that if they re-cast it, there'd be an update of the part
> >>> number, no?
> >>> --
> >>> Old Crow
> >>> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
> >>> '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
> >>> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
> >>> "There's only 1 RE"
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>Yes but even if they just machined the hole larger it would have a
> >>different
> >>part number as well.
> >
> > Not if they retooled for the existing cases
> >
> >
>
> If they don't change the part number then which case do you get when you
> order that part number? The one with the 5/8" hole or the one with the 3/4"
> hole? They need two part numbers to be able to service two different parts
> for replacement.
>
> diablo
Damn and to think I actually agree with you on this. What the fuck?
Roger
no dirt!
|
|
|
