| American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #761997] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 00:11 |
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
Spin this one, Mitch.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762000 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 03:23 |
|
"rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
| http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
|
| Spin this one, Mitch.
War is hell, as they say. Until you're faced with similar situations, I
would let others take care of what is wrong and what is right.
Alanb
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762001 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 03:34 |
|
"rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
:
: Spin this one, Mitch.
What's to spin? I was against our invasion of Iraq, but what you're seeing
in tragic instances like these are a few young soldiers cracking under the
constant fear and uncertainty of their daily existence. These kids are
worn out from extended tours, short turn around deployments and simply
waking up every day wondering if today is their last day alive.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762002 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 03:55 |
|
Guys, let's try and follow Larry's request and save the political stuff for
other boards. I know there are terrible things going on all over, I come
here to hear about sim-racing.
"Bob V" <transition [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iuednRWyVPaueh3ZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d [at] adelphia.com...
>
> "rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
> news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
> :
> : Spin this one, Mitch.
>
> What's to spin? I was against our invasion of Iraq, but what you're
> seeing
> in tragic instances like these are a few young soldiers cracking under the
> constant fear and uncertainty of their daily existence. These kids are
> worn out from extended tours, short turn around deployments and simply
> waking up every day wondering if today is their last day alive.
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762003 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 04:14 |
|
Bob V wrote:
> "rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
> news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
> :
> : Spin this one, Mitch.
>
> What's to spin? I was against our invasion of Iraq, but what you're seeing
> in tragic instances like these are a few young soldiers cracking under the
> constant fear and uncertainty of their daily existence. These kids are
> worn out from extended tours, short turn around deployments and simply
> waking up every day wondering if today is their last day alive.
>
>
>
That is exactly what the civilians are feeling, all brought upon them by
invaders. They had a much happier life before. No, they did not fear
Saddam's jails because most people werent criminals, and didnt speak
against the covernment (which is what a lot of you guys would like).
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762004 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 05:02 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C68698.991A5AB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
TROLL ALERT.......whooooop whooooop.....
"rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message =
news:dg6gg.8707$h01.8452 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
That is exactly what the civilians are feeling, all brought upon them =
by=20
invaders. They had a much happier life before. No, they did not fear=20
Saddam's jails because most people werent criminals, and didnt speak=20
against the covernment (which is what a lot of you guys would like).
------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C68698.991A5AB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>TROLL ALERT.......whooooop =
whooooop.....</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"rex roland" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:rex [at] roland.com">rex [at] roland.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:dg6gg.8707$h01.8452 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com">news:dg6gg.8707=
$h01.8452 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com</A>...</DIV><BR><BR>That=20
is exactly what the civilians are feeling, all brought upon them by=20
<BR>invaders. They had a much happier life before. No, they did not =
fear=20
<BR>Saddam's jails because most people werent criminals, and didnt =
speak=20
<BR>against the covernment (which is what a lot of you guys would=20
like).</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C68698.991A5AB0--
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762005 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 06:02 |
|
How about innocent until proven guilty. Lets not jump on the bandwagon to
persecute them until we know all the facts. Give them the benefit of the
doubt until proven guilty. they've earned it.
LS
"Bob V" <transition [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iuednRWyVPaueh3ZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d [at] adelphia.com...
>
> "rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
> news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
> :
> : Spin this one, Mitch.
>
> What's to spin? I was against our invasion of Iraq, but what you're
> seeing
> in tragic instances like these are a few young soldiers cracking under the
> constant fear and uncertainty of their daily existence. These kids are
> worn out from extended tours, short turn around deployments and simply
> waking up every day wondering if today is their last day alive.
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762006 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 06:55 |
|
What's to talk about in the Race Sim world that hasnt been covered to death?
We can talk about the never-ending rF beta's some more I guess. How about
"which wheel" is best, or even better bash iRacing some more ;)
I agree with you to a certain extent Chad but this really is a dead time for
Race Sims and which do you prefer silence or an occasional OT political war
(which you can easily ignore). Hell Im forced to wade through posts from
the console crowd and all that arcade crap (just about as bad as liberal BS)
;)
Cant a few of us just talk about what ever we like similar to the water
cooler? This is an un-moderated NG (why I come here and not some place like
RSC) and really anyone can say pretty much say whatever they want which is a
strength not a weakness.
That said, as long as I don;t see the troll Rex/Fredrickson/Larry/Reggie
posts I won't respond and will try to stay on topic.
Edit those replies folks, or better yet just dont reply to the Rex moron at
all, OK....
Mitch
"Chad Rogers" <chadliz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:f9-dnbSjFoK6cR3ZRVn-hg [at] comcast.com...
> Guys, let's try and follow Larry's request and save the political stuff
> for other boards. I know there are terrible things going on all over, I
> come here to hear about sim-racing.
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762007 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 12:43 |
|
>From linked article: "The pictures came from a hardline Sunni group
opposed to coalition forces." AND "It has been cross-checked with other
images taken at the time of events and is believed to be genuine"
No agenda issues there? Also, it took that long for an alleged
"massacre" to surface in the media? I can watch a car chase in
California live on CNN or FOX, but I can't get news of this "incident"
any sooner than 2 1/2 months after the fact, even from the opposing
side? If the Sunni group was so outraged, then wouldn't it seem more
probable to publicize the incident right away? Or did the Sunni group
need to authenticate the video first? They always seem to be erring on
the side of caution I suppose.
Even putting aside due process for minute and going right to
sentencing, we are talking about less than 50 soldiers who acted
wrongly. A fractional percentage of the US forces who are there on
orders trying to do the right thing in every case.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762008 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 13:51 |
|
Darus wrote:
>>From linked article: "The pictures came from a hardline Sunni group
> opposed to coalition forces." AND "It has been cross-checked with other
> images taken at the time of events and is believed to be genuine"
>
> No agenda issues there? Also, it took that long for an alleged
> "massacre" to surface in the media? I can watch a car chase in
> California live on CNN or FOX, but I can't get news of this "incident"
> any sooner than 2 1/2 months after the fact, even from the opposing
> side? If the Sunni group was so outraged, then wouldn't it seem more
> probable to publicize the incident right away? Or did the Sunni group
> need to authenticate the video first? They always seem to be erring on
> the side of caution I suppose.
>
> Even putting aside due process for minute and going right to
> sentencing, we are talking about less than 50 soldiers who acted
> wrongly. A fractional percentage of the US forces who are there on
> orders trying to do the right thing in every case.
>
Please can we get back to Sim Racing?
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762009 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 15:33 |
|
> Cant a few of us just talk about what ever we like similar to the water
> cooler? This is an un-moderated NG (why I come here and not some place like
> RSC) and really anyone can say pretty much say whatever they want which is a
> strength not a weakness.
>
> That said, as long as I don;t see the troll Rex/Fredrickson/Larry/Reggie
> posts I won't respond and will try to stay on topic.
>
> Edit those replies folks, or better yet just dont reply to the Rex moron at
> all, OK....
So you want us to moderate it just for you? Sounds like wanting cake and
eating it to me!
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762010 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 17:28 |
|
> Spin this one, Mitch.
Allow me to "spin" this one with facts.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060603/D8I0ODT00.html
Amazing what a bit of time and investigation can reveal.
"rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
>
> Spin this one, Mitch.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762012 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 19:06 |
|
"Online Racer" <joe [at] lnjphoto.com> wrote in message
news:LIegg.37834$4L1.37591 [at] newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
| Darus wrote:
| >>From linked article: "The pictures came from a hardline Sunni group
| > opposed to coalition forces." AND "It has been cross-checked with other
| > images taken at the time of events and is believed to be genuine"
| >
| > No agenda issues there? Also, it took that long for an alleged
| > "massacre" to surface in the media? I can watch a car chase in
| > California live on CNN or FOX, but I can't get news of this "incident"
| > any sooner than 2 1/2 months after the fact, even from the opposing
| > side? If the Sunni group was so outraged, then wouldn't it seem more
| > probable to publicize the incident right away? Or did the Sunni group
| > need to authenticate the video first? They always seem to be erring on
| > the side of caution I suppose.
| >
| > Even putting aside due process for minute and going right to
| > sentencing, we are talking about less than 50 soldiers who acted
| > wrongly. A fractional percentage of the US forces who are there on
| > orders trying to do the right thing in every case.
| >
| Please can we get back to Sim Racing?
Good idea. I agree with this 50-soldier thing. This kind of thing happens
in war, on both sides: it's the nature of the beast. Hiding it for all this
time is worst than the actual act, is my feeling. It would be like someone
racing on rFactor. He joins a server and does a few fast laps. Someone
asks him, hey, how are you so fast? The guy replies, dunno-- it's my first
time on this track.
But the guy had been running the track since last November.
Sorry-- it's the best I can do. :)
Alanb
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762013 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 19:36 |
|
Youre playing into the trolls hand here Tony and it's really surprising
coming from you.
No, I want you to moderate it just for you (and other OT haters). Im not
crying about OT posts am I?
You ask me to stay OnT and I gave you a suggestion that will keep my
responses OnT. If that's to difficult then be prepared for OT posts.
Pretty simple, no? ...
I'm giving a pass on this thread but will not next time. Dont come back
crying to me about OT when I do.
Sounds to me like youre wanting cake and eating it too Tony, LOL.
Mitch
--------
"Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raining".
"Tony Rickard" <tony.rickardno [at] spam.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Kcggg.80253
> So you want us to moderate it just for you? Sounds like wanting cake and
> eating it to me!
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762014 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 19:52 |
|
Sure does.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
--
David G Fisher
"Lancelot" <luxuryman2001 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iM2dnfw3_8NbNxzZnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
>> Spin this one, Mitch.
>
> Allow me to "spin" this one with facts.
> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060603/D8I0ODT00.html
>
> Amazing what a bit of time and investigation can reveal.
>
>
>
>
> "rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
> news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
>>
>> Spin this one, Mitch.
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762015 ] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 21:00 |
|
"Mitch A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:yMjgg.107428$dW3.30391 [at] newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
||
| I'm giving a pass on this thread but will not next time.
Man, you are one tough SOB.
Alanb
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762016 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 00:44 |
|
Mitch A wrote:
>
> I'm giving a pass on this thread but will not next time. Dont come back
> crying to me about OT when I do.
>
Get lost, you scumbag! You think you're so tough? Well, you're just a
worthless turd.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762017 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 01:19 |
|
Mitch A wrote:
> You ask me to stay OnT and I gave you a suggestion that will keep my
> responses OnT. If that's to difficult then be prepared for OT posts.
> Pretty simple, no? ...
Mitch, I am sure you are more than capable of being responsible for your
own actions and don't need to rely on others to prevent you from
responding to troll posts.
Sure I'd rather not see the OT political stuff as in my opinion it
degrades the value of the group - but heck this is usenet and we have
both been around here long enough to know the score. It is one opinion
in a diverse group and if you choose to disagree with it so be it.
Cheers
Tony
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762020 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 03:19 |
|
sarcasm
Sure..... LOL
/sarcasm
"Mike Hunt" <m.hunt_66 [at] aol.com> wrote in message
news:yhogg.2439$rC1.2396 [at] newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> Mitch A wrote:
>
> Get lost, you scumbag! You think you're so tough? Well, you're just a
> worthless turd.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762022 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 03:47 |
|
I dont disagree Tony.
Not sure if youve noticed but I havent said a word about politics in this
thread.
The thread went into another direction but not due to my responses.
All I asked is whats new in the simracing world to talk about.
Anything?
Mitch
"Tony Rickard" <tony.rickardno [at] spam.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:wOogg.80535$wl.16124 [at] text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> both been around here long enough to know the score. It is one opinion in
> a diverse group and if you choose to disagree with it so be it.
>
> Cheers
> Tony
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762023 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 03:51 |
|
AOL... Youre kidding right? Maybe you should check with Daddy before you
use his PC next time K.... LOL
Mitch
"Mike Hunt" <m.hunt_66 [at] aol.com> wrote in message
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762024 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 04:22 |
|
Just to be clear I DONT REPLY to the trolls. I reply to the people that
reply to the Trolls :) I have a filter and use it as I suggest anyone that
wants use for me.
You are reading (and comprehending) what Im saying arent you TR? It doesnt
sound like it lately.
Mitch
"Tony Rickard" <tony.rickardno [at] spam.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:wOogg.80535$wl.16124 [at] text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Mitch A wrote:
>
>> You ask me to stay OnT and I gave you a suggestion that will keep my
>> responses OnT. If that's to difficult then be prepared for OT posts.
>> Pretty simple, no? ...
>
> Mitch, I am sure you are more than capable of being responsible for your
> own actions and don't need to rely on others to prevent you from
> responding to troll posts.
>
> Sure I'd rather not see the OT political stuff as in my opinion it
> degrades the value of the group - but heck this is usenet and we have both
> been around here long enough to know the score. It is one opinion in a
> diverse group and if you choose to disagree with it so be it.
>
> Cheers
> Tony
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762026 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 05:18 |
|
"Mitch A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:Jtrgg.131072$F_3.10512 [at] newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
| Just to be clear I DONT REPLY to the trolls. I reply to the people that
| reply to the Trolls :) I have a filter and use it as I suggest anyone
that
| wants use for me.
|
| You are reading (and comprehending) what Im saying arent you TR? It
doesnt
| sound like it lately.
|
| Mitch
|
Are you seriously concerned about all this? It's not like the Feds are
going to come knocking at your door, intended to arrest you for responding
to Trolls. And they are not Trolls, anyhow. A Troll is not a regular, and
only appears and disappears, never responding to those who respond to his
troll.
Alanb
|
|
|
| My apolgies for the language contained within [message #762027 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 05:37 |
|
"Mitch A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in
news:jD8gg.34162$fb2.13337 [at] newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
>
> I agree with you to a certain extent Chad but this really is a dead
> time for Race Sims and which do you prefer silence or an occasional OT
> political war (which you can easily ignore).
>
> Cant a few of us just talk about what ever we like similar to the
> water cooler? This is an un-moderated NG (why I come here and not
> some place like RSC) and really anyone can say pretty much say
> whatever they want which is a strength not a weakness.
NO! There are places to discus this tripe just as there are place for me
to take a DUMP! People have asked both sides NICELY to stop. Since
neither seems to want to listen I won't be nice.
I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR POLITICAL POSITIONS.
I DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE BEEN INSULTED OR MIS-INTERPRETED. GO
SOMEWHERE ELSE. GO TO ALT.WATERCOOLER.PISSONTHEOTHERGUY. BUT DON'T COME
HERE AND FILL UP THE NEWSGROUP WITH ANY MORE POLITICAL TALK.
When folks ask you NICELY to stop and all the both of you do is rationalize
why what YOU have to say is too important to be quiet...then you just don't
have any consideration for the group. I'm guilty too, I added to
this..but now I've seen my error and I'm stopping. AND SO THE FVCK SHOULD
YOU YOU GO**AMN LITTLE FOURYEAROLDS!!!! Do I need to be any plainer?
This is no different than some auto software guy flooding our newsgroup
with pirated auto diagnostic software. It's wrong. If you don't know
it...you should.
Again, my aplogies to the group for plainspeak.
Dave Henrie
|
|
|
| Re: My apolgies for the language contained within [message #762028 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 06:00 |
|
Show me the last post I made about politics here? You are feeding the
fucking trolls and blaming me!
Talking about why I respond to a trolls post isnt politics. If you cant
read thats your issue, sheeesh!
Don;t go postal, OK Cliff Claven....
Mitch
"Dave Henrie" <daveBITEMEhenrie [at] comcast.net> > I DON'T CARE ABOUT
YOUR POLITICAL POSITIONS.
>
> I DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE BEEN INSULTED OR MIS-INTERPRETED. GO
> SOMEWHERE ELSE. GO TO ALT.WATERCOOLER.PISSONTHEOTHERGUY. BUT DON'T COME
> HERE AND FILL UP THE NEWSGROUP WITH ANY MORE POLITICAL TALK.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762032 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 06:26 |
|
It's becoming quite enjoyable. Crazy postal workers make me a bit nervous
though (based purely on past history) LOL..
Mitch
"Alan Bernardo" <ifeelyourpain [at] ihatebush.net> wrote in > Are you seriously
concerned about all this? It's not like the Feds are
> going to come knocking at your door, intended to arrest you for responding
> to Trolls.
|
|
|
| Re: My apolgies for the language contained within [message #762033 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 06:32 |
|
To take Alan's queue, what exactly is "plainer"? Some sort of power tool?
LOL
Just had too :)
Mitch
"Dave Henrie" <daveBITEMEhenrie [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns97D7D1D5BF1D3davehenriecomcastnet [at] 216.196.97.136...
> "Mitch A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in
> news:jD8gg.34162$fb2.13337 [at] newssvr27.news.prodigy.net:
>
>>
>> I agree with you to a certain extent Chad but this really is a dead
>> time for Race Sims and which do you prefer silence or an occasional OT
>> political war (which you can easily ignore).
>>
>> Cant a few of us just talk about what ever we like similar to the
>> water cooler? This is an un-moderated NG (why I come here and not
>> some place like RSC) and really anyone can say pretty much say
>> whatever they want which is a strength not a weakness.
>
>
>
>
> NO! There are places to discus this tripe just as there are place for me
> to take a DUMP! People have asked both sides NICELY to stop. Since
> neither seems to want to listen I won't be nice.
>
> I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR POLITICAL POSITIONS.
>
> I DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE BEEN INSULTED OR MIS-INTERPRETED. GO
> SOMEWHERE ELSE. GO TO ALT.WATERCOOLER.PISSONTHEOTHERGUY. BUT DON'T COME
> HERE AND FILL UP THE NEWSGROUP WITH ANY MORE POLITICAL TALK.
>
> When folks ask you NICELY to stop and all the both of you do is
> rationalize
> why what YOU have to say is too important to be quiet...then you just
> don't
> have any consideration for the group. I'm guilty too, I added to
> this..but now I've seen my error and I'm stopping. AND SO THE FVCK SHOULD
> YOU YOU GO**AMN LITTLE FOURYEAROLDS!!!! Do I need to be any plainer?
>
> This is no different than some auto software guy flooding our newsgroup
> with pirated auto diagnostic software. It's wrong. If you don't know
> it...you should.
>
>
> Again, my aplogies to the group for plainspeak.
>
> Dave Henrie
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762034 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 06:44 |
|
"Tough" isnt something an individual can quantify themselves. It must to be
exhibited :)
I am a real SOB though. What, no arguments ;)
Mitch
"Alan Bernardo" <ifeelyourpain [at] ihatebush.net> wrote in > Man, you are one
tough SOB.
>
> Alanb
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762040 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 11:27 |
|
Mitch A wrote:
> Just to be clear I DONT REPLY to the trolls. I reply to the people that
> reply to the Trolls :) I have a filter and use it as I suggest anyone that
> wants use for me.
The frustration which caused the original request to dump the OT stuff
is that there are posters who get drawn into the ot threads also post
credible on topic stuff which gets lost with a simple filter. The
filters work fine for the truly inane poster!
> You are reading (and comprehending) what Im saying arent you TR? It doesnt
> sound like it lately.
I think I understand it perfectly, you are saying you can't restrain
yourself if someone responds to a poster you have killfiled, hence my
previous response:
>> Mitch, I am sure you are more than capable of being responsible for your
>> own actions and don't need to rely on others to prevent you from
>> responding to troll posts.
Whether you want to is another matter :)
Cheers
Tony
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762048 ] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 20:12 |
|
>"Tony Rickard" <tony.rickardno [at] spam.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote
> Sure I'd rather not see the OT political stuff as in my opinion it
> degrades the value of the group -
This newsgroup is completely irrelevant. It serves no purpose to the
simracing community anymore. Just let it go rotten, I say.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762053 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 12:07 |
|
"Alan Bernardo" <ifeelyourpain [at] ihatebush.net> wrote in message
news:EOqdnUUTJf4WeR3ZnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
>
> "rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
> news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> | http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
> |
> | Spin this one, Mitch.
>
> War is hell, as they say. Until you're faced with similar situations, I
> would let others take care of what is wrong and what is right.
>
The threat of death or injury is a pressure that is character testing -
and there are all too many reports of extremely poor character. As is stated
in the movie Troy - "War is old men talking and young men dying". This is
worse.
The entire present U.S administration. is hopelessly lacking in
character and George W Bush is a perfect bumbling boob to front it. He looks
like a character out of a MAD magazine.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762054 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 14:13 |
|
"LS" <lanniesNOSPAM [at] mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:lR7gg.760457$084.314495 [at] attbi_s22...
> How about innocent until proven guilty. Lets not jump on the bandwagon to
> persecute them until we know all the facts. Give them the benefit of the
> doubt until proven guilty. they've earned it.
>
You know, normally that would be spot on - but this is a very different
world to what it was a few decades ago. I think giving others the benefit of
the doubt is a VERY bad policy nowadays. The U.S. is too often guilty of
this type of thing and seen to lie and want to sweep it under the carpet.
The U.S. is not trustworthy or worthy of any benefit of doubt. The U.S.,
courtesy of countless piss poor examples of humanity at all levels of
society, is certainly worthy of being seen as guilty until proven innocent.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762056 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 15:28 |
|
We don't need this. Knock it off.
-Larry
"rex roland" <rex [at] roland.com> wrote in message
news:6I2gg.8515$h01.4661 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5039420.stm
>
> Spin this one, Mitch.
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762057 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 15:29 |
|
Once it starts, it never ends Mitch. Time to stop it now. Move it to a
more appropriate place.
-Larry
"Mitch A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:jD8gg.34162$fb2.13337 [at] newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> What's to talk about in the Race Sim world that hasnt been covered to
> death? We can talk about the never-ending rF beta's some more I guess.
> How about "which wheel" is best, or even better bash iRacing some more ;)
>
> I agree with you to a certain extent Chad but this really is a dead time
> for Race Sims and which do you prefer silence or an occasional OT
> political war (which you can easily ignore). Hell Im forced to wade
> through posts from the console crowd and all that arcade crap (just about
> as bad as liberal BS) ;)
>
> Cant a few of us just talk about what ever we like similar to the water
> cooler? This is an un-moderated NG (why I come here and not some place
> like RSC) and really anyone can say pretty much say whatever they want
> which is a strength not a weakness.
>
> That said, as long as I don;t see the troll Rex/Fredrickson/Larry/Reggie
> posts I won't respond and will try to stay on topic.
>
> Edit those replies folks, or better yet just dont reply to the Rex moron
> at all, OK....
>
> Mitch
>
> "Chad Rogers" <chadliz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:f9-dnbSjFoK6cR3ZRVn-hg [at] comcast.com...
>> Guys, let's try and follow Larry's request and save the political stuff
>> for other boards. I know there are terrible things going on all over, I
>> come here to hear about sim-racing.
>>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762059 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 17:11 |
|
Oh but you (and others) constantly crying is OK?....
STFU already, sheeesh.
THIS IS AN UN-MODERATED GROUP, IF YOU DONT FUCKING LIKE IT LEAVE.......
QUIT FUCKING CRYING TO ME ABOUT IT ALREADY....
Mitch
--
"Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing".
"Larry" <none [at] none.com> wrote in message
news:QkWgg.40347$fG3.28816 [at] dukeread09...
> Once it starts, it never ends Mitch. Time to stop it now. Move it to a
> more appropriate place.
>
> -Larry
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762060 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 18:41 |
|
My friend, you just blew off what is probably the last semi-supporter you
had here.
Now I don't care any more.
Have fun.
-Larry
"Mitch -A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:NQXgg.16555$VE1.14378 [at] newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> Oh but you (and others) constantly crying is OK?....
>
> STFU already, sheeesh.
>
> THIS IS AN UN-MODERATED GROUP, IF YOU DONT FUCKING LIKE IT LEAVE.......
> QUIT FUCKING CRYING TO ME ABOUT IT ALREADY....
>
> Mitch
>
> --
> "Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing".
>
>
> "Larry" <none [at] none.com> wrote in message
> news:QkWgg.40347$fG3.28816 [at] dukeread09...
>> Once it starts, it never ends Mitch. Time to stop it now. Move it to a
>> more appropriate place.
>>
>> -Larry
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762061 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 18:52 |
|
Larry wrote:
> My friend, you just blew off what is probably the last semi-supporter you
> had here.
>
> Now I don't care any more.
>
> Have fun.
>
> -Larry
>
> "Mitch -A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:NQXgg.16555$VE1.14378 [at] newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>> Oh but you (and others) constantly crying is OK?....
>>
>> STFU already, sheeesh.
>>
>> THIS IS AN UN-MODERATED GROUP, IF YOU DONT FUCKING LIKE IT LEAVE.......
>> QUIT FUCKING CRYING TO ME ABOUT IT ALREADY....
>>
>> Mitch
>>
>> --
>> "Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing".
>>
>>
>> "Larry" <none [at] none.com> wrote in message
>> news:QkWgg.40347$fG3.28816 [at] dukeread09...
>>> Once it starts, it never ends Mitch. Time to stop it now. Move it to a
>>> more appropriate place.
>>>
>>> -Larry
>>
>
>
Is there a way to get it moderated ?
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762062 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 19:15 |
|
Youre are kidding right?
And who will decide on whats OT in RAS? You? Sure... That work about as
good as the RSC moderators. <rolls eyes>.....
Notice that about the only new responses for days has been to the threads
yall are so concerned about censoring?
Crying about OT posts is OFF TOPIC but thats ok cause YOU feel its ok,
right? Get over yourself already.
Can't ANYONE talk about something new in Simracing? ANYONE?????
ANYTHING?????? Quit bitching and start a thread already.... Till you do
STFU....
Mitch
And Larry, I guess I wont have to worry about you wrecking me out on th
elast lap anymore eh? My heart is broken <vbseg>
--
"Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing".
"Online Racer" <joe [at] lnjphoto.com> wrote in message > Is there a way to get
it moderated ?
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #762070 ] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 20:58 |
|
OT has never been the problem.
OT about politics, war or religion is ALWAYS a problem.
-Larry
"Mitch -A" <naman [at] nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:JEZgg.132544$F_3.44262 [at] newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> Youre are kidding right?
>
> And who will decide on whats OT in RAS? You? Sure... That work about as
> good as the RSC moderators. <rolls eyes>.....
>
> Notice that about the only new responses for days has been to the threads
> yall are so concerned about censoring?
>
> Crying about OT posts is OFF TOPIC but thats ok cause YOU feel its ok,
> right? Get over yourself already.
>
> Can't ANYONE talk about something new in Simracing? ANYONE?????
> ANYTHING?????? Quit bitching and start a thread already.... Till you do
> STFU....
>
> Mitch
>
> And Larry, I guess I wont have to worry about you wrecking me out on th
> elast lap anymore eh? My heart is broken <vbseg>
>
> --
> "Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing".
>
> "Online Racer" <joe [at] lnjphoto.com> wrote in message > Is there a way to get
> it moderated ?
>
|
|
|
| Re: American soldiers have deliberately killed more civilians [message #767126 ] |
Tue, 06 June 2006 07:13 |
|
aah the America is the problem line of thinking..how creative.
PAPADOC
> You know, normally that would be spot on - but this is a very different
>world to what it was a few decades ago. I think giving others the benefit of
>the doubt is a VERY bad policy nowadays. The U.S. is too often guilty of
>this type of thing and seen to lie and want to sweep it under the carpet.
>The U.S. is not trustworthy or worthy of any benefit of doubt. The U.S.,
>courtesy of countless piss poor examples of humanity at all levels of
>society, is certainly worthy of being seen as guilty until proven innocent.
>
My Blog all about politics and the terror war.
www.papadoc.net/PinkFlamingoBar.html
|
|
|
