| 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #462393] |
Mon, 03 October 2005 00:37 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #462404 ] |
Mon, 03 October 2005 19:02 |
|
Steve <robertscvn68 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in
news:run0k15hcv5ja12kptu49f2tbfbj3vrpb6 [at] 4ax.com:
> I am in the Navy in san diego and, needless to say, on a VERY
> limited budget.
> I have a 1984 Sportster with 28k on it. It has always been well
> maintained.
> On a recent charity ride here in san diego it was hard to shift,
> upshift or downshift. I know this is not much to go on, but
> I do have a service manual on it.
> Can any one give me suggestions, besides taking it to a
> HD Dealer.
Try adjusting the primary chain first.
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #467584 ] |
Wed, 05 October 2005 04:06 |
|
Is it an early 84 or late 84? Shifter linkage and clutch cable adjusted
properly?
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #467592 ] |
Wed, 05 October 2005 19:32 |
|
"Arby" <choppersrule77 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1128478009.459210.313740 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
> Is it an early 84 or late 84? Shifter linkage and clutch cable
> adjusted properly?
How the hell should I know? Or weren't you talking to me? Use some
quotations from the one you're replying to.
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #467593 ] |
Wed, 05 October 2005 20:49 |
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:32:28 -0500, "TKŪ" <randomerror [at] hotmail.com>
wrote:
>"Arby" <choppersrule77 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in
>news:1128478009.459210.313740 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Is it an early 84 or late 84? Shifter linkage and clutch cable
>> adjusted properly?
>
>How the hell should I know? Or weren't you talking to me? Use some
>quotations from the one you're replying to.
Don't waste yer time TK, Arby is a fuckin' idjut. Always has been,
always will be.
Snarl... the "he's stuck on stupid" Asshole(tm)
--
Snarl AH#67 BS#37 SENS
EKIII rides with me...
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #467594 ] |
Wed, 05 October 2005 21:09 |
|
snarl67 [at] trippin.net wrote in
news:4v78k1lf34rce3i03n93nckpnaqpfub1sm [at] 4ax.com:
>>> Is it an early 84 or late 84? Shifter linkage and clutch cable
>>> adjusted properly?
>>
>>How the hell should I know? Or weren't you talking to me? Use some
>>quotations from the one you're replying to.
>
> Don't waste yer time TK, Arby is a fuckin' idjut. Always has been,
> always will be.
Yeah, you're right. I see it's a googlegroup poster...says enough.
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471359 ] |
Fri, 07 October 2005 11:02 |
|
TK=AE wrote:
> snarl67 [at] trippin.net wrote in
> news:4v78k1lf34rce3i03n93nckpnaqpfub1sm [at] 4ax.com:
>
> >>> Is it an early 84 or late 84? Shifter linkage and clutch cable
> >>> adjusted properly?
> >>
> >>How the hell should I know? Or weren't you talking to me? Use some
> >>quotations from the one you're replying to.
> >
> > Don't waste yer time TK, Arby is a fuckin' idjut. Always has been,
> > always will be.
>
> Yeah, you're right. I see it's a googlegroup poster...says enough.
>
Heh, painting with a damn wide brush there, ain't ya guys?
It ain't Google, it's the poster. Arby'd be an idiot with or without
Google.
In my case, the only ISP available to me in the local area dropped
usenet completly, and being the cheap fuck that I am, I've started
using Google. I quote, I snip, and I buy drinks in the bar across the
street.
I also emailed the OP and told him to make sure his clutch is adjusted
correctly first off.
--
Old Crow
'82 FLTC-P "Pearl"
'95 Wrangler YJ
TOMKAT, SENS, BS#133, MAMBM, SLOB#13
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471363 ] |
Fri, 07 October 2005 19:49 |
|
"Old Crow" <walliscrow [at] yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1128675777.359965.135000 [at] z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
>> > Don't waste yer time TK, Arby is a fuckin' idjut. Always has been,
>> > always will be.
>>
>> Yeah, you're right. I see it's a googlegroup poster...says enough.
>>
>
> Heh, painting with a damn wide brush there, ain't ya guys?
> It ain't Google, it's the poster. Arby'd be an idiot with or without
> Google.
> In my case, the only ISP available to me in the local area dropped
> usenet completly, and being the cheap fuck that I am, I've started
> using Google. I quote, I snip, and I buy drinks in the bar across the
> street.
The difference is that you already knew how to post properly before you
used Google. I think people like Arby don't even know what usenet
is.
But in this case you're right, I was generalizing. Sorry about that. I
hope the rest of the 'Googlers' will follow your example of how to use
Google in this usenet environment.
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471366 ] |
Fri, 07 October 2005 21:41 |
|
TKŪ wrote:
snip
> The difference is that you already knew how to post properly before
> you used Google. I think people like Arby don't even know what usenet
> is.
snip
FWIW, if you use Outlook Express there is an add-on for it called "OE
Quotefix" that will keep original post and all replies seperated correctly
and each one in a different color. I don't remember who recommended it but
I've been using it for a couple years and it's a great addition.
If interested in it, google and it's available in a lot of places. If you
want to remove it's easy to go back.
I'm not related in any way to anyone associated with it so this isn't spam.
HTH, davidj92
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471367 ] |
Fri, 07 October 2005 21:44 |
|
davidj92 wrote:
> TKŪ wrote:
> snip
>> The difference is that you already knew how to post properly before
>> you used Google. I think people like Arby don't even know what usenet
>> is.
> snip
>
> FWIW, if you use Outlook Express there is an add-on for it called "OE
> Quotefix" that will keep original post and all replies seperated
> correctly and each one in a different color. I don't remember who
> recommended it but I've been using it for a couple years and it's a
> great addition. If interested in it, google and it's available in a lot of
> places. If
> you want to remove it's easy to go back.
> I'm not related in any way to anyone associated with it so this isn't
> spam. HTH, davidj92
Forgot to include it's freeware.
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471368 ] |
Fri, 07 October 2005 22:12 |
|
"davidj92" <davidj92REMOVE [at] sigecom.net> wrote in
news:R8mdnXnfS7W9TdveRVn-vA [at] sigecom.net:
>>> The difference is that you already knew how to post properly before
>>> you used Google. I think people like Arby don't even know what
>>> usenet is.
>> snip
>>
>> FWIW, if you use Outlook Express there is an add-on for it called "OE
>> Quotefix" that will keep original post and all replies seperated
>> correctly and each one in a different color. I don't remember who
>> recommended it but I've been using it for a couple years and it's a
>> great addition. If interested in it, google and it's available in a
>> lot of places. If
>> you want to remove it's easy to go back.
>> I'm not related in any way to anyone associated with it so this isn't
>> spam. HTH, davidj92
For OE users this is a great add-on. I left OE years ago for this reason
(and some security reasons).
> Forgot to include it's freeware.
So is Xnews :)
http://xnews.newsguy.com/
Once you get the hang of this software you'll never go back.
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471378 ] |
Sun, 09 October 2005 00:06 |
|
snarl67 [at] trippin.net wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:32:28 -0500, "TKŪ" <randomerror [at] hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Arby" <choppersrule77 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in
>>news:1128478009.459210.313740 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>>Is it an early 84 or late 84? Shifter linkage and clutch cable
>>>adjusted properly?
>>
>>How the hell should I know? Or weren't you talking to me? Use some
>>quotations from the one you're replying to.
>
>
> Don't waste yer time TK, Arby is a fuckin' idjut. Always has been,
> always will be.
>
> Snarl... the "he's stuck on stupid" Asshole(tm)
At least since 1999.
http://tinyurl.com/c9krq
--
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset.
to email me, concatenate the following:
nom de plume of Jay, Madison, Hamilton-The Federalist
(new, in Latin) at (this planet) dot net
|
|
|
| OT Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471379 ] |
Sun, 09 October 2005 04:30 |
|
TKŪ wrote:
snip
> For OE users this is a great add-on. I left OE years ago for this
> reason (and some security reasons).
>
>> Forgot to include it's freeware.
>
> So is Xnews :)
>
> http://xnews.newsguy.com/
>
> Once you get the hang of this software you'll never go back.
Poked aroung a bit on the site and it looks like it might be a good choice.
I'm assuming by your comment on security that it doesn't have the security
holes OE does?
I also noticed a bit of info on binaries in the notes. Have you used it for
binaries? If so, do you know how it compares to a news robot like NewsBin
Pro?
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471380 ] |
Sun, 09 October 2005 05:02 |
|
Yes I'm replying to you, brain dead. You asked the question didn't
you??? Early 84 and late 84 have different things in the tranny and
clutch assembly so you HAVE to know. Never mind. Take the bike to
somebody and have it fixed. You can't follow a message stream and don't
even know what the hell you're riding. Anything short of filling the
gas tank ( you do know where to put the gas right?)will be way over
your head.
How the hell should I know? Or weren't you talking to me? Use some
> quotations from the one you're replying to.=20
>=20
> --=20
> TK=AE
|
|
|
| Re: OT Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471384 ] |
Sun, 09 October 2005 13:15 |
|
"davidj92" <davidj92REMOVE [at] sigecom.net> wrote in
news:-tCdnQfu555cHdXeRVn-pA [at] sigecom.net:
>> So is Xnews :)
>>
>> http://xnews.newsguy.com/
>>
>> Once you get the hang of this software you'll never go back.
>
> Poked aroung a bit on the site and it looks like it might be a good
> choice. I'm assuming by your comment on security that it doesn't have
> the security holes OE does?
It got no security holes like OE (had/have) that I'm aware of. It's
smarter, smaller and can't be fooled like OE can be fooled by fake
executables. There is no VB-scripting or other stuff in it.
> I also noticed a bit of info on binaries in the notes. Have you used
> it for binaries? If so, do you know how it compares to a news robot
> like NewsBin Pro?
NewsBin Pro is a binarie reader only, it collects (period).
I'm using Xnews in abmph. It collects the binairies and can post a reply
(which NBPRO can't). It can even collect big binaries (like movies) from
newsgroups. Select all of them and then press F4 to decode them.
Take the time to read the manual. Learn the keyboard-shortcuts.
Just unzip it and start it up. To be honest: For an OE-user it's a
cultureshock and it will take a while to get used to it.The first
week you will have the urge to go back to OE again because you think
it's easier. Get beyond this point and you will never use OE again.
Just try it. I hope you like it.
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471385 ] |
Sun, 09 October 2005 13:25 |
|
"Arby" <choppersrule77 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1128825598.448191.251890 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> Yes I'm replying to you, brain dead. You asked the question didn't
> you???
As a mather of fact I didn't ask the question, you top-posting moron.
This says enough about you incapability in posting correctly to the
right person in newsgroups.
> Early 84 and late 84 have different things in the tranny and
> clutch assembly so you HAVE to know. Never mind. Take the bike to
> somebody and have it fixed. You can't follow a message stream and
> don't even know what the hell you're riding. Anything short of filling
> the gas tank ( you do know where to put the gas right?)will be way
> over your head.
'You can't follow the right message stream'?!? Bwahahahahaa!
Don't bother to apologize, you'll be answering the wrong poster
again I'm afraid. Be ashamed...be very ashamed...
--
TKŪ
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471393 ] |
Sun, 09 October 2005 21:22 |
|
Arby wrote:
>( you do know where to put the gas right?)
>
Up yer ass with Mobil Gas.
And, Happy Motoring.
Need a light?
--
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset.
to email me, concatenate the following:
nom de plume of Jay, Madison, Hamilton-The Federalist
(new, in Latin) at (this planet) dot net
|
|
|
| Re: OT Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #471396 ] |
Mon, 10 October 2005 00:19 |
|
TKŪ wrote:
snip
> Just try it. I hope you like it.
OK, I'm going to try it for a bit.
|
|
|
| Re: 84 Sporster Transmission Problem..........PLEASE HELP [message #477311 ] |
Tue, 11 October 2005 19:29 |
|
TKŪ wrote:
> "davidj92" <davidj92REMOVE [at] sigecom.net> wrote in
> For OE users this is a great add-on. I left OE years ago for this
> reason (and some security reasons).
>
>> Forgot to include it's freeware.
>
> So is Xnews :)
>
> http://xnews.newsguy.com/
>
> Once you get the hang of this software you'll never go back.
I used it, got the hang of it, and went back.
It seemed waaay too binary-oriented for my tastes. The only binary group
I "read" is a.b.p.m.h. and I don't need to worry about yEnc or even
multi-part binaries over there (generally).
I've tried most all news-readers (yes, Agent too--many times) and still
prefer OE (only use it for Usenet). I do intend to give TBird a whirl
though. I just don't need all that much. Don't do much binary stuff,
don't use kill-files, and OE (with Quotefix) just fits like an old shoe.
Still gonna try TBird though...
--
Mike | Reality:
'04 FLHTCUI | A crutch for people who can't face drugs.
|
|
|
