| 95 XJ front axle U-joints [message #784408] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 03:22 |
|
Wife's 95 XJ - passenger side U-joint is toast,,,, I took a look at the
drivers side and it is not as bad but in need of replacement. Since I will
have the BFH out I figure I will do both sides this weekend.
On jack stands and getting liberal doses of PB Blaster as of this post.
Question:
I have done both sides on my 93 YJ,,,, is there any difference in the
procedure on the 95 XJ?
thanks
paul
|
|
|
| Re: 95 XJ front axle U-joints [message #784423 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 05:47 |
|
Hi Paul,
None, other than you may not have an axle disengage:
http://www.billhughes.com/Dana30WheelBearing/index.htm
http://www.4x4wire.com/tech/axle/ujoint/
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd [at] aol.com
paul wrote:
>
> Wife's 95 XJ - passenger side U-joint is toast,,,, I took a look at the
> drivers side and it is not as bad but in need of replacement. Since I will
> have the BFH out I figure I will do both sides this weekend.
>
> On jack stands and getting liberal doses of PB Blaster as of this post.
>
> Question:
> I have done both sides on my 93 YJ,,,, is there any difference in the
> procedure on the 95 XJ?
>
> thanks
> paul
|
|
|
| Re: 95 XJ front axle U-joints [message #784467 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 21:22 |
|
The procedure should be the same. The u-joints themselves are a larger
size in the 95 (spicer 5-760x).
paul wrote:
> Wife's 95 XJ - passenger side U-joint is toast,,,, I took a look at the
> drivers side and it is not as bad but in need of replacement. Since I will
> have the BFH out I figure I will do both sides this weekend.
>
> On jack stands and getting liberal doses of PB Blaster as of this post.
>
> Question:
> I have done both sides on my 93 YJ,,,, is there any difference in the
> procedure on the 95 XJ?
>
> thanks
> paul
|
|
|
