|
Motorcycles » rec.motorcycles.harley » Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it...
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771772 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 05:41 |
|
Chilly wrote:
> Dana Taramina <dana [at] spamicide.gryffyn.com> sed:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:39:27 -0400, "Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This woman is obviously not broke. If she wanted to find someone, it's
>>> pretty easy to do it using multiple commonly used methods including
>>> internet search companies and detectives. Posting stuff on usenet to
>>> try and smoke someone out seems silly to me. Again, if she shows up
>>> IRL somewhere and tells her real story eye to eye, I'm always open to
>>> listen. But somehow I doubt we'll have meet. 'course, I been wrong
>>> before. :)
>> She's been invited to my house in September where she's been assured
>> it's completely safe for her to be. I'm quite convinced that *she's*
>> convinced it's not safe for her to go to the Eddie run. So don't be
>> surprised if she doesn't go there.
>
> I dunno Dana, I want to believe the reason she came clean is because she's
> grown to like this place, plans to show up irl, and knows she's got some
> bridges to repair. She's supported Eddie, I'm guessing she wants to be
> there for his BD, she's shown a tough carapace throughout this thread -
> taking her knocks, responding to adversity with humor ... I cannot imagine
> her showing up for Eddie's BD would be unsafe. Awkward around a few folks,
> (myself included) shirley, but unsafe? Nah.
>
>
How many IRL's have we had where things got out of hand? At the most,
someone might decline your handshake or offer of a beer. But that's the
thing about this place, you can cuss each other all ya want in here but
riding across country to meet that same person puts it in a different
realm. Let's see if she shows up at Eddie's. I was gonna say the
gauntlet has been thrown down, but instead just say the invitation has
been extended.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771776 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 05:57 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:51:16 -0400, Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:57:35 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Just bend her over the pinball table and form a line, her mother will be
>> doing the coat check.
>
>
> ???
>
> How about we march out your daughter to do the coat check, Tud? Or
> your mother? Or your sister?
>
> NO FUCKING SMILEY FACE.
Oh, my! Looks like somebody had an extra helping of PissyFlakes!
--
Spunky the Tuna
always steer toward the llamas...
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771778 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:31 |
|
roach wrote:
> "DM at work" <fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
> Chilly says
>
>>> I dunno Dana, I want to believe the reason she came clean is
>>> because she's grown to like this place, plans to show up irl, and
>>> knows she's got some bridges to repair. She's supported Eddie, I'm
>>> guessing she wants to be there for his BD, she's shown a tough
>>> carapace throughout this thread - taking her knocks, responding to
>>> adversity with humor ... I cannot imagine her showing up for
>>> Eddie's BD would be unsafe. Awkward around a few folks, (myself
>>> included) shirley, but unsafe? Nah.
>
> Hell no. She ain't Castle Critter, ferchrisakes, and my daughter won't
> be there this year.
>
>>>
>>>
>> How many IRL's have we had where things got out of hand?
>
> EKIII a few years ago when some crackhead in the next
> campsite was beating on his girlfriend. We took care of that
> real quick.
>
>
>> At the most,
>> someone might decline your handshake or offer of a beer. But that's
>> the thing about this place, you can cuss each other all ya want in
>> here but riding across country to meet that same person puts it in a
>> different realm. Let's see if she shows up at Eddie's. I was gonna
>> say the gauntlet has been thrown down, but instead just say the
>> invitation has been extended.
>>
>> Fins BS#221
>
> I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
<snip>
Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as fact as
to what/who she's claimed to be. Now, for the real question, which regular
was it that convinced her that it would be a good idea to come clean with a
new intro in order to get a fresh start only to have it backfire? I'm not
expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever bite her in the
ass.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771780 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:24 |
|
"DM at work" <fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
Chilly says
> > I dunno Dana, I want to believe the reason she came clean is because
she's
> > grown to like this place, plans to show up irl, and knows she's got some
> > bridges to repair. She's supported Eddie, I'm guessing she wants to be
> > there for his BD, she's shown a tough carapace throughout this thread -
> > taking her knocks, responding to adversity with humor ... I cannot
imagine
> > her showing up for Eddie's BD would be unsafe. Awkward around a few
folks,
> > (myself included) shirley, but unsafe? Nah.
Hell no. She ain't Castle Critter, ferchrisakes, and my daughter won't
be there this year.
> >
> >
> How many IRL's have we had where things got out of hand?
EKIII a few years ago when some crackhead in the next
campsite was beating on his girlfriend. We took care of that
real quick.
>At the most,
> someone might decline your handshake or offer of a beer. But that's the
> thing about this place, you can cuss each other all ya want in here but
> riding across country to meet that same person puts it in a different
> realm. Let's see if she shows up at Eddie's. I was gonna say the
> gauntlet has been thrown down, but instead just say the invitation has
> been extended.
>
> Fins BS#221
I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
Beckyboo put a flag for auction on the Eddie site, told all exactly
what they were bidding on.
I *know* that the typical price for such a flag is about 45 bucks
retail.
I won the flag, and me and Shirley corresponded privately about
the transaction, and in so doing, I was given more private info
about her name, address, etc that y'all ain't privy to, and it all
was correct information.
I recieved the flag precicely when she told me I'd recieve it,
and it was of the quality that had been represented to me.
Consequently, I know where she lives, I know who her
partner in the flag business is, and my take is they're allright
people.
As far as why Stone would show up on a web site she used to
help flush out a snake I could only speculate.
But then again, I've been wrong once or twice before.
--
"but I don't mean that in a bad sort of a way"
Roach AH#123, A Hoodlum© Asshole(tm)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771781 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:35 |
|
roach wrote:
> "DM at work" <fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
> Chilly says
>
>>> I dunno Dana, I want to believe the reason she came clean is because
> she's
>>> grown to like this place, plans to show up irl, and knows she's got some
>>> bridges to repair. She's supported Eddie, I'm guessing she wants to be
>>> there for his BD, she's shown a tough carapace throughout this thread -
>>> taking her knocks, responding to adversity with humor ... I cannot
> imagine
>>> her showing up for Eddie's BD would be unsafe. Awkward around a few
> folks,
>>> (myself included) shirley, but unsafe? Nah.
>
> Hell no. She ain't Castle Critter, ferchrisakes, and my daughter won't
> be there this year.
>
>>>
>> How many IRL's have we had where things got out of hand?
>
> EKIII a few years ago when some crackhead in the next
> campsite was beating on his girlfriend. We took care of that
> real quick.
>
>
>> At the most,
>> someone might decline your handshake or offer of a beer. But that's the
>> thing about this place, you can cuss each other all ya want in here but
>> riding across country to meet that same person puts it in a different
>> realm. Let's see if she shows up at Eddie's. I was gonna say the
>> gauntlet has been thrown down, but instead just say the invitation has
>> been extended.
>>
>> Fins BS#221
>
> I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
>
> Beckyboo put a flag for auction on the Eddie site, told all exactly
> what they were bidding on.
>
> I *know* that the typical price for such a flag is about 45 bucks
> retail.
>
> I won the flag, and me and Shirley corresponded privately about
> the transaction, and in so doing, I was given more private info
> about her name, address, etc that y'all ain't privy to, and it all
> was correct information.
>
> I recieved the flag precicely when she told me I'd recieve it,
> and it was of the quality that had been represented to me.
>
> Consequently, I know where she lives, I know who her
> partner in the flag business is, and my take is they're allright
> people.
This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to the
EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I can
apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment she's
received here. Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and
try to have some fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone again.
>
> As far as why Stone would show up on a web site she used to
> help flush out a snake I could only speculate.
Me too, but it's really none of my business why his picture is there and
I really don't care.
>
> But then again, I've been wrong once or twice before.
But not this time.
> --
> "but I don't mean that in a bad sort of a way"
> Roach AH#123, A Hoodlum© Asshole(tm)
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771782 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:42 |
|
"Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GW_sg.9335$pu3.212331 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> > I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
>
> <snip>
>
> Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as fact
as
> to what/who she's claimed to be.
Oh, I ain't disputing that. I've seen the bullshit, and am sorely
disappointed by said bullshit. I was only staing facts that I know.
>Now, for the real question, which regular
> was it that convinced her that it would be a good idea to come clean with
a
> new intro in order to get a fresh start only to have it backfire?
I hope you ain't implying, but it certainly wasn't me. Could be that she
really intended to show up at EKIII and thought it would be a good
idea.
>I'm not
> expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever bite her in the
> ass.
Can't argue with that.
roach
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771783 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:42 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to the
> EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I can
> apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment she's
> received here.
No offense tooberdude, but this strikes me as rather arrogant that you
feel you'd speak on behalf of all of rmh. I haven't taken sides on this,
and I'd meet her IRL, but I don't think an apology is required when
somebody claims bullshit.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771784 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:44 |
|
roach wrote:
> "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:GW_sg.9335$pu3.212331 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>
>
>>> I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
>> <snip>
>>
>> Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as fact
> as
>> to what/who she's claimed to be.
>
> Oh, I ain't disputing that. I've seen the bullshit, and am sorely
> disappointed by said bullshit. I was only staing facts that I know.
>
>> Now, for the real question, which regular
>> was it that convinced her that it would be a good idea to come clean with
> a
>> new intro in order to get a fresh start only to have it backfire?
>
> I hope you ain't implying, but it certainly wasn't me. Could be that she
> really intended to show up at EKIII and thought it would be a good
> idea.
>
I think that's what was stated. Can't be showing up at an IRL not
looking like your picture.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771787 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:48 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and try to have some
> fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone
> again.
Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go, and in a
day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let it go, there'll
be the occassional jab and "yer full of shit" and after an IRL we'll all be
laughing about it (and asking to see more pics of the girls). The question
is whether she makes it for that day or two and sticks around long enough to
make it to an IRL.
Some people slide right in here, some come with the wrong intentions and end
up having to work a little harder at it, same ole same ole.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771788 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:48 |
|
DM at work wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to
>> the EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I
>> can apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment
>> she's received here.
>
> No offense tooberdude, but this strikes me as rather arrogant that you
> feel you'd speak on behalf of all of rmh. I haven't taken sides on this,
> and I'd meet her IRL, but I don't think an apology is required when
> somebody claims bullshit.
>
> Fins BS#221
Get over it. Claiming bullshit is one thing, but you are certainly aware
it didn't end there. Not nearly.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771789 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:54 |
|
"roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
> "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>
> >I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever
> >bite her in the ass.
>
> Can't argue with that.
Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even Schmoe'll
share a bottle with her.
Heh, if she has any nads, she'll show up wearing an Amsoil t shirt...
--
Chilly BS#226
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771791 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:58 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> DM at work wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to
>>> the EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I
>>> can apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment
>>> she's received here.
>>
>> No offense tooberdude, but this strikes me as rather arrogant that you
>> feel you'd speak on behalf of all of rmh. I haven't taken sides on
>> this, and I'd meet her IRL, but I don't think an apology is required
>> when somebody claims bullshit.
>>
>> Fins BS#221
>
> Get over it. Claiming bullshit is one thing, but you are certainly aware
> it didn't end there. Not nearly.
>
You're right, it didn't stop there. If you feel she needs an apology,
extend your regrets that things turned out this way and encourage her to
stay. But don't offer those regrets on behalf of rmh.
If it turns out she's not full of shit then those that want can
apologize at that point if *they* feel it's due.
Apologizing on behalf of all takes away our individuality. This is RMH,
you will be assimilated.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771792 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 06:58 |
|
"Chilly" <wjghouse [at] nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97FE939E194BChillyspewage [at] 69.28.186.121...
> "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
>
> > "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
> >
> > >I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever
> > >bite her in the ass.
> >
> > Can't argue with that.
>
> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even Schmoe'll
> share a bottle with her.
Ya mean like certain netscum shared a bottle with Kathy in
Wildwood one year?
--
"but I don't mean that in a bad sort of a way"
Roach AH#123, A Hoodlum© Asshole(tm)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771793 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:02 |
|
Tud wrote:
> roach wrote:
>> I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
>
> <snip>
>
> Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as fact as
> to what/who she's claimed to be. Now, for the real question, which regular
> was it that convinced her that it would be a good idea to come clean with a
> new intro in order to get a fresh start only to have it backfire? I'm not
> expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever bite her in the
> ass.
>
I just erased 5 paragraphs detailing why you've been wrong headed about
this whole thing. It was a waste of time but left me feeling better. If
you had taken the time to get to know her better you'd know she didn't
need to be told to do a re-intro. And neither of us knows if anyone did
tell her that, but then so much of what has passed in this thread
materialized full bloom in your head. If anyone did suggest that I have
not doubt it was suggested in a friendly way and in good faith that the
better side of this joint would shine through. This place is not always
the feral dog pack this thread would have one believe.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771794 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:04 |
|
Tud wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and try to have some
>> fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone
>> again.
>
> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go, and in a
> day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let it go, there'll
> be the occassional jab and "yer full of shit" and after an IRL we'll all be
> laughing about it (and asking to see more pics of the girls). The question
> is whether she makes it for that day or two and sticks around long enough to
> make it to an IRL.
>
> Some people slide right in here, some come with the wrong intentions and end
> up having to work a little harder at it, same ole same ole.
>
Sorry, Tud, but you crossed a line.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771796 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:10 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tud wrote:
>> roach wrote:
>
>>> I know it's after midnight, but here's the *facts* as I *know* them.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as
>> fact as to what/who she's claimed to be. Now, for the real
>> question, which regular was it that convinced her that it would be a
>> good idea to come clean with a new intro in order to get a fresh
>> start only to have it backfire? I'm not expecting anyone to answer
>> that, but damned, did that ever bite her in the ass.
>>
>
> I just erased 5 paragraphs detailing why you've been wrong headed
> about this whole thing. It was a waste of time but left me feeling
> better.
You're an excellent wordsmith, much better than I will ever be, even if I
were to reach your advanced years ;-) so I'm sure it would have been well
worth the read, but I've certainly backspaced over a few longwinded posts
myself and can understand the therapeutic properties of simply typing it.
> If you had taken the time to get to know her better you'd
> know she didn't need to be told to do a re-intro.
Nothing in her posts gave me an urge to do so.
> And neither of us
> knows if anyone did tell her that, but then so much of what has
> passed in this thread materialized full bloom in your head. If anyone
> did suggest that I have not doubt it was suggested in a friendly way
> and in good faith that the better side of this joint would shine
> through.
I have no doubt. I couldn't imagine that someone would have suggested it
maliciously, nor was that my implication.
> This place is not always the feral dog pack this thread
> would have one believe.
Nope, not always.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771797 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:10 |
|
DM at work wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> DM at work wrote:
>>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to
>>>> the EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I
>>>> can apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment
>>>> she's received here.
>>>
>>> No offense tooberdude, but this strikes me as rather arrogant that
>>> you feel you'd speak on behalf of all of rmh. I haven't taken sides
>>> on this, and I'd meet her IRL, but I don't think an apology is
>>> required when somebody claims bullshit.
>>>
>>> Fins BS#221
>>
>> Get over it. Claiming bullshit is one thing, but you are certainly
>> aware it didn't end there. Not nearly.
>>
>
> You're right, it didn't stop there. If you feel she needs an apology,
> extend your regrets that things turned out this way and encourage her to
> stay. But don't offer those regrets on behalf of rmh.
>
> If it turns out she's not full of shit then those that want can
> apologize at that point if *they* feel it's due.
>
> Apologizing on behalf of all takes away our individuality. This is RMH,
> you will be assimilated.
>
> Fins BS#221
My mother didn't teach me manners because she didn't know how or have
many of her own to share. That I learned the hard way. The elder
statesman and northern gentleman that I am requires it (ok, having a
little trouble keeping a straight face here). Assimilate me, but I will
do the right thing. I've already extended my regrets and my
disappointment but if given the opportunity to look her in the eye, I
will say "I'm sorry".
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771798 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:16 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tud wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and try to have
>>> some fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone
>>> again.
>>
>> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go,
>> and in a day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let
>> it go, there'll be the occassional jab and "yer full of shit" and
>> after an IRL we'll all be laughing about it (and asking to see more
>> pics of the girls). The question is whether she makes it for that
>> day or two and sticks around long enough to make it to an IRL.
>>
>> Some people slide right in here, some come with the wrong intentions
>> and end up having to work a little harder at it, same ole same ole.
>>
>
> Sorry, Tud, but you crossed a line.
Who's? (now's your chance to re-write that post you mentioned)
I'd add a smiley face in there, but I'll be damned if I didn't think you
were already well past that point.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771801 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:35 |
|
Tud wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Tud wrote:
>>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and try to have
>>>> some fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone
>>>> again.
>>> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go,
>>> and in a day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let
>>> it go, there'll be the occassional jab and "yer full of shit" and
>>> after an IRL we'll all be laughing about it (and asking to see more
>>> pics of the girls). The question is whether she makes it for that
>>> day or two and sticks around long enough to make it to an IRL.
>>>
>>> Some people slide right in here, some come with the wrong intentions
>>> and end up having to work a little harder at it, same ole same ole.
>>>
>> Sorry, Tud, but you crossed a line.
>
> Who's? (now's your chance to re-write that post you mentioned)
Now you know why I deleted it :)
>
> I'd add a smiley face in there, but I'll be damned if I didn't think you
> were already well past that point.
There's a legitimate time for anger and disappointment. This has been a
time of disappointment. That's just the way I'm wired.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771802 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:49 |
|
Chilly wrote:
> "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
>
>> "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>
>>> I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever
>>> bite her in the ass.
>> Can't argue with that.
>
> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even Schmoe'll
> share a bottle with her.
>
> Heh, if she has any nads, she'll show up wearing an Amsoil t shirt...
>
>
With a BIG badge that says:
"I am NOT Dave Stone"
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771803 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 07:53 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771804 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 08:02 |
|
Chuck Lanter wrote:
> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
Yeah, does nothing good for rmh IMO. The signal to noise ration went to
shit with this one.
Les
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771807 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 08:06 |
|
Les wrote:
> Chuck Lanter wrote:
>> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
>
> Yeah, does nothing good for rmh IMO. The signal to noise ration went to
> shit with this one.
>
> Les
Ya - but we're at the kiss and make up stage. I always get weepy...
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771808 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 08:14 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Les wrote:
>> Chuck Lanter wrote:
>>> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
>>
>> Yeah, does nothing good for rmh IMO. The signal to noise ration went
>> to shit with this one.
>>
>> Les
>
> Ya - but we're at the kiss and make up stage. I always get weepy...
I'm a little weepy myself, of course mine could be attributed to it being
3:11am here, I'm still sitting at my desk at work after 19 hours while
watching the server recontruct a database as a result of a server crash, all
while listing to the thunder and pouring rain outside the window while the
Ural sits in the parking lot unprotected from the elements. At more than
one point this evening I thought it was karma getting back at me for
"crossing the line". ;-)
I'm going to go find a couch in about 20 minutes in order to catch about 2
hours sleep. You thought I crossed the line before, just wait until I get
all silly from the lack of sleep.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771809 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 08:21 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Les wrote:
>> Chuck Lanter wrote:
>>> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
>>
>> Yeah, does nothing good for rmh IMO. The signal to noise ration went
>> to shit with this one.
>>
>> Les
>
> Ya - but we're at the kiss and make up stage. I always get weepy...
Hopefully you'll have time to get over it before the next cluster.
Les
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771812 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 11:34 |
|
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:25:14 -0400, Spunky the Tuna
<spunkythetuna [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:10:42 -0400, Beckyboo wrote:
>
>> Fwiw, Chris Donaldson is my nephew, killed in Afghanistan. And the only
>> real bullshit was the picture of my twins. My twins wanted me to do
>> this, along with Danny. I didn't really want any part of it, to be
>> honest. But I'm home and have the time to do the posting.
>>
>> I didn't think I'd ever want to actually meet up with any of you IRL or
>> anyone from the net for that matter. I hung out here and in the
>> sportsbike group long enough to try to get Stan Berde to surface and he
>> did through his friends. Stan is an old man who goes after young
>> girls...and my twins knew that, so for their aunt, my sister, they were
>> willing to take one for the team. But they are adults, not kids either.
>> They are 26.
>>
>> If you see shame in that, then so be it, but you'd really need to hear
>> the whole story about Stan and his ways to understand this one better.
>
>You're really Stephen Cannell in drag testing out a new TV show character
>arc, aren't you?
>
>It won't work. Too fanciful.
>
>Oh, it pulls at the heartstrings of the ignorant and the simple; a nephew
>killed on a foreign shore while doing his patriotic duty and the twins
>willing to risk dishonor for the greater good of the species in an attempt to
>flush out an EvilInternetPredatorAndChildMolester and, in case all of that
>failed, there's the FaithAndBegorrah IrishLassFromCountyCowShit all fleein'
>from The Troubles and all.
>
>Nope. Too complicated, to entangled with coincidence, too unrealistic,
>simply unacceptable. Even for the folks who are distracted from the real
>with bread and circuses.
I don't know, Spunky. My niece really was killed by some prick that
she met on the 'net and married, who then disappeared, taking all her
possessions and insurance money with him. My bro-in-law searched in
vain for the dude until the day he died.
Who knows what you might try in such a situation?
--
Old Crow
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
"There's only 1 RE"
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771814 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 11:51 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:07:21 -0700, "Tinman"
<mlynch [at] REMOVEMEcitlink.net> wrote:
>
>The mental image of a cute 26-year-old blond posting here was
>entertaining, interesting, and indeed bewildering.
Heh, I've been around cute 26 year old blondes...they tire me out.
>
>But finding out it's actually *the mother*?! That's just soooo wrong...
Probably more my age anyway.
--
Old Crow
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
"There's only 1 RE"
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #771821 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 11:51 |
|
"Chuck Lanter" <clltwo [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C0D9EA890005512EF0407530 [at] news.cableone.net...
>
> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
Fuckin A.
--
Tony D AH# 129
1971 R75/5 boxer
2004 R1150 Rockster
Philly Hoodlum©#37
SENS (less) LFS#38
BS#149 FYYFMFFY
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778086 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 13:48 |
|
On 2006-07-12 04:08:37 -0700, "Tony D" <hs2bud [at] rockstercox.net> said:
>
> "Chuck Lanter" <clltwo [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:0001HW.C0D9EA890005512EF0407530 [at] news.cableone.net...
>>
>> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
>
> Fuckin A.
I haven't read it yet. What's going on?
<d&r>
--
Nancy
97 xl1200custom
86 fxr really custom
93 miata "Dodger"
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778099 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 14:59 |
|
dp sed:
>This place is not always the feral dog pack this thread would have one
>believe.
John Kerry, izat you?.
<flip-flop>
<flip-flop>
ASSHOLE#104 Len
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778100 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:03 |
|
Chuck sed:
> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
Is not.
ASSHOLE#104 Len
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778101 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:08 |
|
AH#104 wrote:
> dp sed:
>> This place is not always the feral dog pack this thread would have one
>> believe.
>
> John Kerry, izat you?.
> <flip-flop>
> <flip-flop>
>
> ASSHOLE#104 Len
>
>
Discuss.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778104 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:15 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:35:30 -0400, Dennis Peterson pontificated:
> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to the
> EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I can
> apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment she's
> received here.
LIttle full of yourself, aren't you? Apologizing on behalf of r.m.h? What
in the world makes you think that you have any right and/authority to do such
a thing?
You want to apologize on your own behalf? Spiffy. Knock yourself out. On
behalf of r.m.h? Go fuck yourself.
> Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and
> try to have some fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone again.
Thank you for that.
Oooh! Here's an idea! If you'd like to have a kinder, gentler, more
compassionate group, why don't you start one. You could host it on your
servers, have it by invitation only and only invite people of whom you
approve. People who have proven to you that they are worthy of being there.
People who agree with you and live up to your standards.
I won't hold my breath waiting for an invitation, and I doubt I'll miss the
stampeding hordes leaving r.m.h for your fiefdom.
--
Spunky the Tuna
always steer toward the llamas...
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778105 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:19 |
|
SteveI <steve [at] nospamnite.com> sed:
> Chilly wrote:
>> "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
>>> "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>>
>>>> I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever
>>>> bite her in the ass.
>>>
>>> Can't argue with that.
>>
>> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even
>> Schmoe'll share a bottle with her.
>>
>> Heh, if she has any nads, she'll show up wearing an Amsoil t shirt...
>
> With a BIG badge that says:
>
> "I am NOT Dave Stone"
>
Or "HELLO My name is Herman"
--
Chilly BS#226
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778108 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:22 |
|
> Discuss.
> dp
Oh, hell, if you didn't get it, nevermind.
You originally posted about the shit-hole this place is, then said it's not
always (paraphrased for expediency... and that's how *I* remember it, so you
can't really say you didn't).
Then I throw in a John Kerry sobriquit(sp?), since he's a "C" student and
you're not.
<that'll probably go right over your head too.. and I'll need to explain
*that*>
(Explanation: Dubya was a "C" student too, but ranked higher than Kerry
in his graduating class)
And John Kerry was known as the "Flip Flop Candidate".
There.
Did I leave anything out?
You and I are going to do a lot of discussing at EKIII's.
ASSHOLE#104 Len
Since this is on the internet... It's all true.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778109 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:22 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:34:31 -0400, Old Crow wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:25:14 -0400, Spunky the Tuna
> <spunkythetuna [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> Nope. Too complicated, to entangled with coincidence, too unrealistic,
>> simply unacceptable. Even for the folks who are distracted from the real
>> with bread and circuses.
>
> I don't know, Spunky. My niece really was killed by some prick that
> she met on the 'net and married, who then disappeared, taking all her
> possessions and insurance money with him. My bro-in-law searched in
> vain for the dude until the day he died.
> Who knows what you might try in such a situation?
I could well be wrong. Do unlikely things happen? Sure. All the time. But
it's so unlikely that I'm highly skeptical about it all.
But then, I don't believe very much of anything unproven anyway, so don't
think I'm putting myself up as the living standard.
--
Spunky the Tuna
always steer toward the llamas...
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778113 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:35 |
|
"NanC" <mcnameen001 [at] eatpoi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:2006071201490227590-mcnameen001 [at] eatpoirrcom...
> On 2006-07-12 04:08:37 -0700, "Tony D" <hs2bud [at] rockstercox.net> said:
>
>>
>> "Chuck Lanter" <clltwo [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
>> news:0001HW.C0D9EA890005512EF0407530 [at] news.cableone.net...
>>>
>>> Man, this is one fucked-up thread.
>>
>> Fuckin A.
>
> I haven't read it yet. What's going on?
It's a new show, "Asshole/Troll Whisperer", it a attempts to make everyone
play nice whether they want to or not. Tell the truth, bullshit, outright
deceive, make shit up, raise the noise signal, fuck over ppl and then sing a
line of Cumbaya, fart in the general direction of rmh, start international
incidents over not a fuckin' thing worth reading, save a troll, imagine, nay
let your imagination fly with eagles about the dangers of EKIII to
outsiders, take notes, alienate folks, beg forgivenss with a new story
(truth optional), show off your Nancy Drew certificate, get yer freak on and
be HEARD! Or not, fuck my old boots, this thread just slays me for insipid
flotsum. Glad I could help Nancy.
MaGGie
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778115 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:44 |
|
Spunky the Tuna wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:35:30 -0400, Dennis Peterson pontificated:
>
>> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to the
>> EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I can
>> apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment she's
>> received here.
>
> LIttle full of yourself, aren't you? Apologizing on behalf of r.m.h? What
> in the world makes you think that you have any right and/authority to do such
> a thing?
Yes I am, yes, and it is my inalienable right to say anything that pops
into my head.
>
> You want to apologize on your own behalf? Spiffy. Knock yourself out. On
> behalf of r.m.h? Go fuck yourself.
Lemme get this straight because it has the potential for being circular.
I cannot appologize on behalf of r.m.h, but you can speak out against me
on behalf of r.m.h. Am I on the same page?
>
>> Particularly since I encouraged her to stick it out and
>> try to have some fun. Cold day in hell when I suggest that to anyone again.
>
> Thank you for that.
>
> Oooh! Here's an idea! If you'd like to have a kinder, gentler, more
> compassionate group, why don't you start one. You could host it on your
> servers, have it by invitation only and only invite people of whom you
> approve. People who have proven to you that they are worthy of being there.
> People who agree with you and live up to your standards.
Panhead does not live up to your standards and you have expressed as
much repeatedly. I'd guess I'm on that same list with Ken. If you like,
I can make space available on one of my servers for your own list of
worthy people.
>
> I won't hold my breath waiting for an invitation, and I doubt I'll miss the
> stampeding hordes leaving r.m.h for your fiefdom.
>
Are we all done having it both ways now?
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778117 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:49 |
|
MaGGie wrote:
> get yer freak on
I'm trying to do that as we speak, but I must have put some extra pounds on
because it doesn't go on as easy as it used to.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778119 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:55 |
|
AH#104 wrote:
>> Discuss.
>> dp
>
> Oh, hell, if you didn't get it, nevermind.
>
> You originally posted about the shit-hole this place is, then said it's not
> always (paraphrased for expediency... and that's how *I* remember it, so you
> can't really say you didn't).
> Then I throw in a John Kerry sobriquit(sp?), since he's a "C" student and
> you're not.
> <that'll probably go right over your head too.. and I'll need to explain
> *that*>
> (Explanation: Dubya was a "C" student too, but ranked higher than Kerry
> in his graduating class)
> And John Kerry was known as the "Flip Flop Candidate".
>
> There.
> Did I leave anything out?
> You and I are going to do a lot of discussing at EKIII's.
>
> ASSHOLE#104 Len
> Since this is on the internet... It's all true.
>
>
I'm not riding 6000 miles to talk about politics and colorful
personalities - I'm gonna drink beer and relax.
dp
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Tue Jan 6 18:16:28 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.21113 Sekunden |
