|
Motorcycles » rec.motorcycles.harley » Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it...
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778727 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:32 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:16:24 -0400, "Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net>
wrote:
>Bullshit. A guy would get the exact same responses and has. Your comments
>reek of reverse sexism. I'm a little hurt. <g>
Oh, OW.
>
>Seriously, you keep talking about this like it's a man against woman thread.
>It really isn't. Get over it.
Don't worry your pretty little head over it. I have.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHTCUI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
>
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778728 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:33 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:18:35 -0400, "Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net>
wrote:
>Dana Taramina wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:48:07 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go,
>>> and in a day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let
>>> it go
>>
>> Don't count on it.
>
>
>Yeah yeah we heard ya the 3rd time, no invitiations to your party. I'll have
>to fill my schedule elsewhere.
>
>4
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHTCUI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778730 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:37 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:04:35 GMT, "jojo" <cgv_2000 [at] *remove your
hat*yahoo.com> wrote:
>And Dana, if your reading, there is more personal involvement than a couple
>of hours
>or a few keystrokes. I'm making friends here, or at least think I am. I'm
>hoping you are one
>of them. There are quite a few of you here that I really hope to meet
>someday.
>
>And yes, if you jumped on tomorrow and said you were someone else and
>everything was
>a ruse for some higher purpose, I'd be pissed. I might actually say
>something crass, mean and tacky.
>(which I did). Which I regret, simply because I don't like to be a crass,
>mean and tacky person.
Well, jojo, Bitch Of The Year isn't an honorary title. I see something
I think is wrong, I say so. I still think things were wrong, but I'm
over it. However, I am capable of holding a grudge for decades without
batting an eye over it. Just ask any of my exes. Well, any of them
that are still alive. At any rate, I'll be better after a couple of
martinis.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHTCUI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778731 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:40 |
|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:57:09 -0500, "JC" <jlcole_99 [at] youknowwho.com>
wrote:
>Don't forget the Spandex. And Piercings.
Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHTCUI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778733 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:45 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
Well dip me in Baba Ganouj and throw me to the Lebanese. I thought you
were *already* tattooed...
Skiv :)=)} AH 41 BS 32 SENS IBA DoD IRF
'89 XL Bobster "StraKat": Shake. Rattle. Roll. Repeat.
Cure For Extremism: Let's Kill All The Extremists.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778739 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:56 |
|
"Dana Taramina" <dana [at] spamicide.gryffyn.com> wrote in message
news:avvfb2pclggnmo0kv4tti1nuh5pm988s97 [at] 4ax.com...
.. At any rate, I'll be better after a couple of
> martinis.
>
> Dana
> Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
> '05 FLHTCUI "Belle"
> '03 FLHTCUI
Baby...my plastic is on the bar (I actually can't get it outta my pocket
fast enough)....Shirley(bartender), make sure Dana is happy and I'll match
your tip to the tab!
Dana...order up!
jojo
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778740 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 22:57 |
|
NanC wrote:
> On 2006-07-14 07:42:04 -0700, Dennis Peterson <dennispe [at] inetnw.com> said:
>
>> NanC wrote:
>
> <snip the irrelevant parts>
>
>>> I am, thanks. Though a little bothered by what I'm reading on this
>>> subject. But not here ... over in alt.motorcycle.sportbike.
>>
>> That place has been interesting reading for a month, now. Have you
>> figured it out yet?
>
> What exactly is there to figure out? I was just referring to certain
> posts from the past few days.
> --
> Nancy
>
Ya mean like this one from yesterday?
"Being called a slacker is like a term of endearment compared to that
Harley group...I own a Harley and tried hanging out with them a bit,
rough crowd. Would prefer to hang out with a bunch of inmates from San
Quentin, I bet they'd be nicer."
--
Becky
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++
--
BS, yes I said "BS" 205
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778741 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 23:01 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> NanC wrote:
>> On 2006-07-12 09:26:46 -0700, "Beckyboo" <Beckyboo430 [at] aol.com> said:
>>
>>
>> I am, thanks. Though a little bothered by what I'm reading on this
>> subject. But not here ... over in alt.motorcycle.sportbike.
>
> That place has been interesting reading for a month, now. Have you
> figured it out yet?
>
> dp
Not Nancy but I'll venture a guess.
This wacko is posting as both the daughter and the mother in 2 different
newsgroups? What did I win?
--
BS, yes I said "BS" 205
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778745 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 23:18 |
|
On 2006-07-14 13:57:12 -0700, al <bslug205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> said:
> NanC wrote:
>> On 2006-07-14 07:42:04 -0700, Dennis Peterson <dennispe [at] inetnw.com> said:
>>
>>> NanC wrote:
>>
>> <snip the irrelevant parts>
>>
>>>> I am, thanks. Though a little bothered by what I'm reading on this
>>>> subject. But not here ... over in alt.motorcycle.sportbike.
>>>
>>> That place has been interesting reading for a month, now. Have you
>>> figured it out yet?
>>
>> What exactly is there to figure out? I was just referring to certain
>> posts from the past few days.
>> --
>> Nancy
>>
>
> Ya mean like this one from yesterday?
>
> "Being called a slacker is like a term of endearment compared to that
> Harley group...I own a Harley and tried hanging out with them a bit,
> rough crowd. Would prefer to hang out with a bunch of inmates from San
> Quentin, I bet they'd be nicer."
That might've been one.
La de dah, la de dah ...
--
Nancy
bikes
letters, numbers
pithy quote
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778747 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 23:33 |
|
al wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> NanC wrote:
>>> On 2006-07-12 09:26:46 -0700, "Beckyboo" <Beckyboo430 [at] aol.com> said:
>>>
>
>>>
>>> I am, thanks. Though a little bothered by what I'm reading on this
>>> subject. But not here ... over in alt.motorcycle.sportbike.
>
>>
>> That place has been interesting reading for a month, now. Have you
>> figured it out yet?
>>
>> dp
>
> Not Nancy but I'll venture a guess.
>
> This wacko is posting as both the daughter and the mother in 2
> different newsgroups? What did I win?
An all expence-paid trip to beautiful downtown Altoona,
Pennsyslvania.
--
"but I don't mean that in a bad sort of a way"
Roach AH#123, A Hoodlum© Asshole(tm)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778748 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 23:16 |
|
On 2006-07-14 13:30:12 -0700, Dana Taramina <dana [at] spamicide.gryffyn.com> said:
>>
> Joke? I didn't see a single sfsf anywhere in Tud's "joke". And
> frankly, I just don't think the topic of gang rape and trains is
> funny. But then, since many of you really are pretend bikers, you
> wouldn't know the first thing about the subject.
I'm not taking sides on this clusterfuck. But Dana, FWIW, I didn't see
that as a "gang rape" comment. I saw it as a "consensual group sex"
comment.
And that is the end of my analysis.
--
Nancy
bikes
letters, numbers
pithy quote
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778749 ] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 23:45 |
|
"Dana Taramina" wrote:
>"JC" wrote:
>
>>Don't forget the Spandex. And Piercings.
>
> Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
>
Still working on the arm, or start a new set?
Got any pics of ya in spandex? <g>
Mutt
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778759 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 00:31 |
|
al wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> NanC wrote:
>>> On 2006-07-12 09:26:46 -0700, "Beckyboo" <Beckyboo430 [at] aol.com> said:
>>>
>
>>>
>>> I am, thanks. Though a little bothered by what I'm reading on this
>>> subject. But not here ... over in alt.motorcycle.sportbike.
>
>>
>> That place has been interesting reading for a month, now. Have you
>> figured it out yet?
>>
>> dp
>
> Not Nancy but I'll venture a guess.
>
> This wacko is posting as both the daughter and the mother in 2
> different newsgroups? What did I win?
Aren't ya' gonna hold out for the super bonus question?
--
Mike
BS#247
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778767 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 01:20 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:37:19 -0700, "SteveI (Irv)"
> <steve [at] nospamnite.com> wrote:
>
>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>
>>> Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
>>> chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
>> Not any more......I married mine.
>
> Good for you. And her.
>
Oh but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that
now.......
She's not 26 anymore, but she sure makes ME feel like it
sometimes.....<sfsf>
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778771 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 01:39 |
|
NanC wrote:
> On 2006-07-14 13:30:12 -0700, Dana Taramina <dana [at] spamicide.gryffyn.com>
> said:
>>>
>> Joke? I didn't see a single sfsf anywhere in Tud's "joke". And
>> frankly, I just don't think the topic of gang rape and trains is
>> funny. But then, since many of you really are pretend bikers, you
>> wouldn't know the first thing about the subject.
>
> I'm not taking sides on this clusterfuck. But Dana, FWIW, I didn't see
> that as a "gang rape" comment. I saw it as a "consensual group sex"
> comment.
>
> And that is the end of my analysis.
I was standing in the line, until I heard it was Len who was
bent over the pinball machine..........
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778778 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 02:22 |
|
Tony D wrote:
> "Les" <test_spamgourmet [at] cox.net> wrote in message
> news:OCQtg.101203$IZ2.18370 [at] dukeread07...
> snip;
>> Snow Run in Arkansas, first part of October?
>
> Man I don't know, I just started school and it is kicking my ass but good,
> but I'm NOT ruling it out..
You should be ready for a fall break by then. Bring rain gear...
Les
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778782 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 02:38 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:29:20 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> And just what exactly is your investment in this relationship other
>>> than a couple of hours behind your keyboard? You guys (and I mean
>>> this in general, not you specifically) don't seem to mind that
>>> Panhead changes his name 12 times a day and lies through his teeth
>>> constantly.
>>
>> And I'm sure a few more years of Becky/Shirley/whoever's bullshit
>> and she'll be sufficiently killfiled and ignored to the status the
>> Panhead enjoys today.
>>
> And?
And it's fairly obvious, but since you seem to need it spelled out. It's
not that people don't mind what Panhead does, it's just that it's been going
on for so long that a lot of people just tend to ignore him or have him kill
filed. If Becky continues to change her story she'll eventually get the
same treatment.
>>> What
>>> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because
>>> they got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story
>>> and are embarassed about it.
>>
>> I see a bunch of guys that were fed a load of shit, found out it was
>> a load of shit, and are now calling the liar out. Nothing arrogant
>> about it.
>
> <laugh> ok. You don't see arrogance.
That's right.
>>> Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
>>> chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
>>
>> LOL, if that's what you think it's about then you've got your own
>> problems to deal with.
>
> Yeah, ok, shrink my head, if that's what you want. Not really the
> issue, but if that's what you want to do with your spare time, go
> right ahead.
Oh that's right, YOU'RE the only one allowed to make assumptions as to what
people think.
> I assure you, you're reading more into this than there is.
> And maybe so am I. Wouldn't be the first time. I, however, didn't
> threaten anyone's daughter.
That makes two of us. I merely made a suggestion to a fictitious character
with a fictitious daughter that they were trying to whore out to a complete
stranger.
>> I called her full of shit right after she posted that picture
>> and haven't replied much to her since this thread.
>
> Well you've certainly made up for lost time.
>
>> I suspect back then that
>> she wasn't on the level, then this thread proved it, and now she's
>> getting what she asked for when she started spnning her bogus tale.
>
> oooh, what a *big* man you are.
>
>>
>>> Now you find out you may not and
>>> are running around screaming "injustice!" and pissing on your own
>>> feet. To what lengths would you go to find out where personal
>>> effects were that had been stolen from you by some dirtbag?
>>> Personal effects that were stolen from your dead sister? Anyone
>>> here would have done exactly the same thing in the same situation.
>>
>> Sure, but I wouldn't whine about how I was treated by the people I
>> lied to after the fact.
>
> I haven't actually seen a lot of whining. I've seen a lot of attempted
> humor and trying to fit back in.
Fit *back* in? I must have missed the part where she fit in in the first
place.
> Which is what the *very*
> tongue-in-cheek comment about bringing her daughters out to meet
> Tinman was. The comment that prompted you to start a virtual gang-rape
> scene with said daughters.
Your interpretation is insulting, and I have a very long memory and can hold
a grudge for years..wow, I ALMOST got through that with a straight face, I
forgot for a second that it was you that's been saying that over and over
again, where as this means as much to me as the paper it's written on.
> And please, please don't try to tell me
> that was supposed to be a joke, Because it really wasn't remotely
> funny. It was just sick.
Apparently we don't have the same sense of humor.
>>> Don't believe that was
>>> the situation? Big deal. You have NO personal investment in any of
>>> this, as far as I can tell. NONE OF IT MATTERS. Her checks to Eddie
>>> didn't bounce, that's the only thing that matters.
>>
>> Good for her (sincerely), but is that all it takes to buy you?
>> Should I send a check to Eddie and show up at your place in
>> September?
>
> Buy me? I'm not bought.
Apparently I missinterpreted the statement about the ONLY thing that
mattered to you was the check.
> I'm sticking up for someone I think is being
> unreasonably harassed. Just like I would anyone else I thought was
> being unreasonable harassed.
And I'm harrassing someone that came in here with a load of bullshit, just
like I would with anyone else that came in here with a load of shit. A lot
of times my shit meter doesn't pick them out, but this time it was spot on.
> As for showing up in September, we can discuss it. At length.
I don't think you'll have to go through the unpleasentness of discussing it
with me.
>> Threatening to gang rape
>>> someone's daughter is too far below even RMH for me to imagine.
>>
>> There was no threat. She was enticing members of the group, a VERY
>> PUBLIC group (who knows what kind of lurkers we have) with her 26
>> year old daughter, I figured I'd suggest a way she could speed up
>> the end that result she seemed to be after.
>
> If you can't tell tongue-in-cheek after this long you aren't paying
> attention. And don't even try to tell me that's what your "bend over
> the coat rack" post was. Because I'll tell you to take your coat rack
> and shove it up your ass.
I never said anything about a coat rack, I can't even imagine how you would
bend somebody over a coat rack, but I'm willing to pay attention if you want
to draw me a diagram.
>> One of you're posts indicated that you're not going to let it go,
>> that's fine by me.
>
> That's not exactly what I said. What I said was that I'm not likely to
> forget who and how ugly this got. That's all. Emotional and verbal
> abuse takes its toll on people and I have a very long memory for some
> things.
>
>> As you've said, I've got no personal investment (apparently you
>> feel that you do),
>
> <laugh> How many times did I say "none of this matters"?
Your last paragraph contridicts that, apparently it matters to you or you
wouldn't be continually pointing out how long your memory is.
> Your reaction
> to the situation, however, was totally out of proportion to what was
> going on.
Matter of opinion.
>> it's just a matter of a few keystrokes to keep this
>> going. Will it end me up in a few killfiles? Probably. Don't
>> really care one way or the other. It's a brand new day for me,
>> shall we proceed?
>
> Nope. I'm done.
You don't say.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778784 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 02:50 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:56:00 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:48:07 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go,
>>>> and in a day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least
>>>> let it go
>>>
>>> Don't count on it.
>>
>> Let it fester then, no skin of my nose.
>
> No festering about it. Just a very long memory.
Oviously, as you keep mentioning it.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778796 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 03:38 |
|
"Les" <test_spamgourmet [at] cox.net> wrote in message
news:EzWtg.101219$IZ2.52004 [at] dukeread07...
> Tony D wrote:
> > "Les" <test_spamgourmet [at] cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:OCQtg.101203$IZ2.18370 [at] dukeread07...
> > snip;
> >> Snow Run in Arkansas, first part of October?
> >
> > Man I don't know, I just started school and it is kicking my ass but
good,
> > but I'm NOT ruling it out..
>
> You should be ready for a fall break by then. Bring rain gear...
Always.
--
Tony D AH# 129
1971 R75/5 boxer
2004 R1150 Rockster
Philly Hoodlum©#37
SENS (less) LFS#38
BS#149 FYYFMFFY
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778803 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 04:46 |
|
Dana Taramina <dana [at] spamicide.gryffyn.com> wrote:
> However, I am capable of holding a
> grudge for decades without batting an eye over it. Just ask any
> of my exes. Well, any of them that are still alive.
Oooh, what a big keyboard you have!
--
StT
my epiglottis is full of llamas!
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778808 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 05:13 |
|
Tinman wrote:
> al wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> NanC wrote:
>>>> On 2006-07-12 09:26:46 -0700, "Beckyboo" <Beckyboo430 [at] aol.com>
>>>> said:
>>
>>>>
>>>> I am, thanks. Though a little bothered by what I'm reading on this
>>>> subject. But not here ... over in alt.motorcycle.sportbike.
>>
>>>
>>> That place has been interesting reading for a month, now. Have you
>>> figured it out yet?
>>>
>>> dp
>>
>> Not Nancy but I'll venture a guess.
>>
>> This wacko is posting as both the daughter and the mother in 2
>> different newsgroups? What did I win?
>
> Aren't ya' gonna hold out for the super bonus question?
I would just like to point out that I've stayed out of this thread until
now.
--
"Wakko" NTXNS TOMKAT SENS PHS BS#257
'06 FLHTCUSE "Ultra Chicken"
'03 FLSTSI - "BlingBling" (under reconstruction)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778811 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 05:26 |
|
SteveI (Irv) wrote:
>
> I was standing in the line, until I heard it was Len who was bent over
> the pinball machine..........
>
Coward!
--
BS, yes I said "BS" 205
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778832 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 07:40 |
|
Wakko wrote:
>
> I would just like to point out that I've stayed out of this thread until
> now.
> --
> "Wakko" NTXNS TOMKAT SENS PHS BS#257
> '06 FLHTCUSE "Ultra Chicken"
> '03 FLSTSI - "BlingBling" (under reconstruction)
<AOL mode>
Me Too! (oops)
</AOL mode>
Lisa
BS#250
03 XL 1200C 'Sam'
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778836 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 08:43 |
|
Lilac wrote:
> Wakko wrote:
>> I would just like to point out that I've stayed out of this thread until
>> now.
>> --
>> "Wakko" NTXNS TOMKAT SENS PHS BS#257
>> '06 FLHTCUSE "Ultra Chicken"
>> '03 FLSTSI - "BlingBling" (under reconstruction)
>
> <AOL mode>
> Me Too! (oops)
> </AOL mode>
>
> Lisa
> BS#250
> 03 XL 1200C 'Sam'
>
That's good because this thread is dead as yesterday's news. Please
return to your regularly scheduled bickering. Or if somebody somewhere
is talking about a Harley, pay attention and jump in :)
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778839 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 09:51 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778891 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 21:29 |
|
On 14 Jul 2006 13:45:22 -0700, "Purple Hays" <ponybike [at] hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Dana Taramina wrote:
>
>> Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
>
>Well dip me in Baba Ganouj and throw me to the Lebanese. I thought you
>were *already* tattooed...
oops, my bad. I got tattooed *some more* yesterday. :^)
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778892 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 21:31 |
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:56:30 GMT, "jojo" <cgv_2000 [at] *remove your
hat*yahoo.com> wrote:
>Baby...my plastic is on the bar (I actually can't get it outta my pocket
>fast enough)....Shirley(bartender), make sure Dana is happy and I'll match
>your tip to the tab!
>Dana...order up!
Morphine.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778893 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 21:32 |
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:16:19 GMT, NanC
<mcnameen001 [at] eatpoi.hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>I'm not taking sides on this clusterfuck. But Dana, FWIW, I didn't see
>that as a "gang rape" comment. I saw it as a "consensual group sex"
>comment.
>
>And that is the end of my analysis.
ok. I'll agree to disagree. With you.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778894 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 21:34 |
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:45:56 -0500, "JC" <jlcole_99 [at] youknowwho.com>
wrote:
>Still working on the arm, or start a new set?
>Got any pics of ya in spandex? <g>
Working on my right arm now. No spandex, I'm almost 50 fer chrissakes!
Pics of the new work shortly.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778895 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 21:33 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2006 13:45:22 -0700, "Purple Hays" <ponybike [at] hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>
>>> Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
>> Well dip me in Baba Ganouj and throw me to the Lebanese. I thought you
>> were *already* tattooed...
>
> oops, my bad. I got tattooed *some more* yesterday. :^)
>
> Dana
A woman goes into a tattoo parlor and tells the tattoo artist that she
wants a tattoo of a turkey on her right thigh right up just below her
bikini line. She also wants him to put "Happy Thanksgiving" under the
turkey.
So the guy does it and it comes out looking really good. The woman then
instructs him to put a Santa Clause with "Merry Christmas" up on her
left thigh.
So the guy does it and it comes out looking good, too.
As the woman is getting dressed to leave, the tattoo artist says, "If
you don't mind, could you tell me why you had me put such unusual
tattoos on your thighs?"
She said, "I'm sick and tired of my husband complaining all the time
that there's nothing good to eat between Thanksgiving and Christmas."
--
BS, yes I said "BS" 205
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778898 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 21:45 |
|
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:38:55 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>And it's fairly obvious, but since you seem to need it spelled out. It's
>not that people don't mind what Panhead does, it's just that it's been going
>on for so long that a lot of people just tend to ignore him or have him kill
>filed. If Becky continues to change her story she'll eventually get the
>same treatment.
Thanks for making my point for me.
>
>That makes two of us. I merely made a suggestion to a fictitious character
>with a fictitious daughter that they were trying to whore out to a complete
>stranger.
Yeah. And I believe that's all you were doing.
>> I haven't actually seen a lot of whining. I've seen a lot of attempted
>> humor and trying to fit back in.
>
>Fit *back* in? I must have missed the part where she fit in in the first
>place.
ok, you've missed my point entirely. Which was that I haven't seen a
whole lot of whining. Not from Shirley, anyway.
>
>> Which is what the *very*
>> tongue-in-cheek comment about bringing her daughters out to meet
>> Tinman was. The comment that prompted you to start a virtual gang-rape
>> scene with said daughters.
>
>Your interpretation is insulting, and I have a very long memory and can hold
>a grudge for years..wow, I ALMOST got through that with a straight face, I
>forgot for a second that it was you that's been saying that over and over
>again, where as this means as much to me as the paper it's written on.
Once. I said that once. And since you don't care, why are you making
such a big deal out of it? My interpretation is insulting. So what?
Insulting is what we do best, isn't it? It certainly is what you do
best.
>
>> And please, please don't try to tell me
>> that was supposed to be a joke, Because it really wasn't remotely
>> funny. It was just sick.
>
>Apparently we don't have the same sense of humor.
Oh, you do have that right.
>Apparently I missinterpreted the statement about the ONLY thing that
>mattered to you was the check.
You have misinterpreted absolutely everything about me. Except that we
have very different senses of humor.
>
>> I'm sticking up for someone I think is being
>> unreasonably harassed. Just like I would anyone else I thought was
>> being unreasonable harassed.
>
>And I'm harrassing someone that came in here with a load of bullshit, just
>like I would with anyone else that came in here with a load of shit. A lot
>of times my shit meter doesn't pick them out, but this time it was spot on.
Well big fat yay for you. At the very beginning I also said that
things weren't adding up about Shirley, I just said I didn't care. I
still don't care. That is also a difference between us Tud.
>
>> As for showing up in September, we can discuss it. At length.
>
>I don't think you'll have to go through the unpleasentness of discussing it
>with me.
Well big fat yay for me.
>I never said anything about a coat rack, I can't even imagine how you would
>bend somebody over a coat rack, but I'm willing to pay attention if you want
>to draw me a diagram.
<sigh> ok, no one ever said anything about anything. Whatever.
>> Your reaction
>> to the situation, however, was totally out of proportion to what was
>> going on.
>
>Matter of opinion.
uh, yeah, that's what I write. My opinion.
>
>>> it's just a matter of a few keystrokes to keep this
>>> going. Will it end me up in a few killfiles? Probably. Don't
>>> really care one way or the other. It's a brand new day for me,
>>> shall we proceed?
>>
>> Nope. I'm done.
>
>You don't say.
Once again, I'm beaten down by ridiculousness. I'm going for a ride
and to go play with my tigers. Later all.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778903 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:20 |
|
big al wrote:
> Dana Taramina wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jul 2006 13:45:22 -0700, "Purple Hays" <ponybike [at] hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
>>>
>>> Well dip me in Baba Ganouj and throw me to the Lebanese. I thought you
>>> were *already* tattooed...
>>
>>
>> oops, my bad. I got tattooed *some more* yesterday. :^)
>>
>> Dana
>
>
>
> A woman goes into a tattoo parlor and tells the tattoo artist that she
> wants a tattoo of a turkey on her right thigh right up just below her
> bikini line. She also wants him to put "Happy Thanksgiving" under the
> turkey.
>
> So the guy does it and it comes out looking really good. The woman then
> instructs him to put a Santa Clause with "Merry Christmas" up on her
> left thigh.
>
> So the guy does it and it comes out looking good, too.
>
> As the woman is getting dressed to leave, the tattoo artist says, "If
> you don't mind, could you tell me why you had me put such unusual
> tattoos on your thighs?"
>
> She said, "I'm sick and tired of my husband complaining all the time
> that there's nothing good to eat between Thanksgiving and Christmas."
Maybe if her pie didn't smell like a rotting carp?
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778904 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:21 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2006 13:45:22 -0700, "Purple Hays" <ponybike [at] hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Dana Taramina wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hey you - I got tattooed yesterday!
>>
>>Well dip me in Baba Ganouj and throw me to the Lebanese. I thought you
>>were *already* tattooed...
>
>
> oops, my bad. I got tattooed *some more* yesterday. :^)
Well, all cattle does have to be re-branded.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778905 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:24 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:38:55 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>And it's fairly obvious, but since you seem to need it spelled out. It's
>>not that people don't mind what Panhead does, it's just that it's been going
>>on for so long that a lot of people just tend to ignore him or have him kill
>>filed. If Becky continues to change her story she'll eventually get the
>>same treatment.
>
>
> Thanks for making my point for me.
So you ARE the cunt that said that I was constantly lying, eh?
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778920 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 01:37 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:38:55 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it's fairly obvious, but since you seem to need it spelled out.
>> It's not that people don't mind what Panhead does, it's just that
>> it's been going on for so long that a lot of people just tend to
>> ignore him or have him kill filed. If Becky continues to change her
>> story she'll eventually get the same treatment.
>
> Thanks for making my point for me.
You're welcome, what was your point again? Nevermind, it more than likely
has little to do with the overall discussion
>> That makes two of us. I merely made a suggestion to a fictitious
>> character with a fictitious daughter that they were trying to whore
>> out to a complete stranger.
>
> Yeah. And I believe that's all you were doing.
What you believe or don't believe is of little consequence to me, and I'm
sure that goes both ways.
>>> I haven't actually seen a lot of whining. I've seen a lot of
>>> attempted humor and trying to fit back in.
>>
>> Fit *back* in? I must have missed the part where she fit in in the
>> first place.
>
> ok, you've missed my point entirely. Which was that I haven't seen a
> whole lot of whining. Not from Shirley, anyway.
If that's your point then I agree, she's taken her knocks pretty damned
well, there have been others that simply wouldn't have been able to stay
away and end up making things worse. She was provoked and responded in kind
without letting it chase her off, good for her.
>>> Which is what the *very*
>>> tongue-in-cheek comment about bringing her daughters out to meet
>>> Tinman was. The comment that prompted you to start a virtual
>>> gang-rape scene with said daughters.
>>
>> Your interpretation is insulting, and I have a very long memory and
>> can hold a grudge for years..wow, I ALMOST got through that with a
>> straight face, I forgot for a second that it was you that's been
>> saying that over and over again, where as this means as much to me
>> as the paper it's written on.
>
> Once. I said that once. And since you don't care, why are you making
> such a big deal out of it?
Nothin' better to do at the moment.
> My interpretation is insulting. So what?
> Insulting is what we do best, isn't it? It certainly is what you do best.
Which is why I couldn't get through the statement with a straight face, that
and the long memory bit. Sometimes insulting is what I do best, I certainly
don't expect it to go unreturned..
>> And I'm harrassing someone that came in here with a load of
>> bullshit, just like I would with anyone else that came in here with
>> a load of shit. A lot of times my shit meter doesn't pick them out,
>> but this time it was spot on.
>
> Well big fat yay for you. At the very beginning I also said that
> things weren't adding up about Shirley, I just said I didn't care. I
> still don't care. That is also a difference between us Tud.
Not at all, I truly don't care, just responding for the fun of it, but you
have already stated that you'll remember this, hold on to it as a grudge,
and track everyone that says something you don't like. All that certainly
makes me think that you do indeed care, otherwise you'd be finding this as
funny as I do. Unless I'm reading you wrong and you're laughing about this
as much as I am and truly don't care if I showed up on your doorstep for
your party.
>>> As for showing up in September, we can discuss it. At length.
>>
>> I don't think you'll have to go through the unpleasentness of
>> discussing it with me.
>
> Well big fat yay for me.
I try to please.
>> I never said anything about a coat rack, I can't even imagine how
>> you would bend somebody over a coat rack, but I'm willing to pay
>> attention if you want to draw me a diagram.
>
> <sigh> ok, no one ever said anything about anything. Whatever.
Oh no, I said something, but it was bending over a pinball machine, not a
coat rack, I mean, come on, how the hell do you get bent over a coat rack?
>>> Your reaction
>>> to the situation, however, was totally out of proportion to what was
>>> going on.
>>
>> Matter of opinion.
>
> uh, yeah, that's what I write. My opinion.
>>> Nope. I'm done.
>>
>> You don't say.
>
> Once again, I'm beaten down by ridiculousness.
Gotcha.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778924 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 02:15 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:38:55 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it's fairly obvious, but since you seem to need it spelled out.
>> It's not that people don't mind what Panhead does, it's just that
>> it's been going on for so long that a lot of people just tend to
>> ignore him or have him kill filed. If Becky continues to change her
>> story she'll eventually get the same treatment.
>
> Thanks for making my point for me.
You're welcome, what was your point again? Nevermind, it more than likely
has little to do with the overall discussion
>> That makes two of us. I merely made a suggestion to a fictitious
>> character with a fictitious daughter that they were trying to whore
>> out to a complete stranger.
>
> Yeah. And I believe that's all you were doing.
What you believe or don't believe is of little consequence to me, and I'm
sure that goes both ways.
>>> I haven't actually seen a lot of whining. I've seen a lot of
>>> attempted humor and trying to fit back in.
>>
>> Fit *back* in? I must have missed the part where she fit in in the
>> first place.
>
> ok, you've missed my point entirely. Which was that I haven't seen a
> whole lot of whining. Not from Shirley, anyway.
If that's your point then I agree, she's taken her knocks pretty damned
well, there have been others that simply wouldn't have been able to stay
away and end up making things worse. She was provoked and responded in kind
without letting it chase her off, good for her.
>>> Which is what the *very*
>>> tongue-in-cheek comment about bringing her daughters out to meet
>>> Tinman was. The comment that prompted you to start a virtual
>>> gang-rape scene with said daughters.
>>
>> Your interpretation is insulting, and I have a very long memory and
>> can hold a grudge for years..wow, I ALMOST got through that with a
>> straight face, I forgot for a second that it was you that's been
>> saying that over and over again, where as this means as much to me
>> as the paper it's written on.
>
> Once. I said that once. And since you don't care, why are you making
> such a big deal out of it?
Nothin' better to do at the moment.
> My interpretation is insulting. So what?
> Insulting is what we do best, isn't it? It certainly is what you do best.
Which is why I couldn't get through the statement with a straight face, that
and the long memory bit. Sometimes insulting is what I do best, I certainly
don't expect it to go unreturned..
>> And I'm harrassing someone that came in here with a load of
>> bullshit, just like I would with anyone else that came in here with
>> a load of shit. A lot of times my shit meter doesn't pick them out,
>> but this time it was spot on.
>
> Well big fat yay for you. At the very beginning I also said that
> things weren't adding up about Shirley, I just said I didn't care. I
> still don't care. That is also a difference between us Tud.
Not at all, I truly don't care, just responding for the fun of it, but you
have already stated that you'll remember this, hold on to it as a grudge,
and track everyone that says something you don't like. All that certainly
makes me think that you do indeed care, otherwise you'd be finding this as
funny as I do. Unless I'm reading you wrong and you're laughing about this
as much as I am and truly don't care if I showed up on your doorstep for
your party.
>>> As for showing up in September, we can discuss it. At length.
>>
>> I don't think you'll have to go through the unpleasentness of
>> discussing it with me.
>
> Well big fat yay for me.
I try to please.
>> I never said anything about a coat rack, I can't even imagine how
>> you would bend somebody over a coat rack, but I'm willing to pay
>> attention if you want to draw me a diagram.
>
> <sigh> ok, no one ever said anything about anything. Whatever.
Oh no, I said something, but it was bending over a pinball machine, not a
coat rack, I mean, come on, how the hell do you get bent over a coat rack?
>>> Your reaction
>>> to the situation, however, was totally out of proportion to what was
>>> going on.
>>
>> Matter of opinion.
>
> uh, yeah, that's what I write. My opinion.
>>> Nope. I'm done.
>>
>> You don't say.
>
> Once again, I'm beaten down by ridiculousness.
Gotcha.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #786403 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 23:44 |
|
Nearly melting the keyboard from friction of those fast fingers, Dennis
Peterson <dennispe [at] inetnw.com> tapped in the following:
> So what that all means is, there's no screening, no yea's or nay's. If a
> nom comes up for a number, a number is cut. No second guessing. The
> trust is deferred entirely to the slimer. That said, the process is less
> than perfect and slimees can slip between the cracks. I'm working on a
> web page that corrects that. See more at waiting for miracles.
>
Yeah, OK. But shouldn't you know that BS doesn't (in this case) stand for
bullshit? Just a thought.
--
Jood (aka Sparky)
Wench #2 | Bitch #7 | ASSHOLE #48 | BOTY II |BS #48
'02 BMW R1200C
'83 H-D FXR(T)
'85 Honda VT700C
|
|
|
| Re: Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to i [message #786404 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 23:56 |
|
Nearly melting the keyboard from friction of those fast fingers, "Purple
Hays" <ponybike [at] hotmail.com> tapped in the following:
> Parties at the Fuckin' A Ranch
> have involved <snipped the list>
Ya forgot Judy's Ribs and potato salad, ya fargin ingrate! :)
>
> If that ain't a party, I may very possibly not know what one is.
I miss parties at your place!
--
Jood (aka Sparky)
Wench #2 | Bitch #7 | ASSHOLE #48 | BOTY II |BS #48
'02 BMW R1200C
'83 H-D FXR(T)
'85 Honda VT700C
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #786409 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 00:32 |
|
Sparky muttered:
> Ya forgot Judy's Ribs and potato salad, ya fargin ingrate! :)
Nope, haven't forgot 'em. Just figured that the list was already past
the point of believability for the folks who had never experienced
Ranch hospitality in person. Had I added that, it would have bent the
pin on the ol' Believ-O-Meter for some folks.
You happy now? <d&r>
> I miss parties at your place!
Well, I tell ya. So do I. :)=)} One of the little disadvantages of
moving away from the center of the US is that only folks on the west
side of the continent want to come up and see us. Too much crap goin'
on this year to throw a little party, but maybe next year, who knows?
Skiv :)=)} AH 41 BS 32 SENS IBA DoD IRF
'89 XL Bobster "StraKat": Shake. Rattle. Roll. Repeat.
"Outta My Way! I Gotta Pee!" -- Sparky
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #786411 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 00:51 |
|
On 2006-07-21 14:56:04 -0700, Judy Fearn <judy.fearn.nospam [at] charter.net> said:
> Nearly melting the keyboard from friction of those fast fingers, "Purple
> Hays" <ponybike [at] hotmail.com> tapped in the following:
>> Parties at the Fuckin' A Ranch
>> have involved <snipped the list>
>
> Ya forgot Judy's Ribs and potato salad, ya fargin ingrate! :)
>>
>> If that ain't a party, I may very possibly not know what one is.
>
> I miss parties at your place!
I can't speak to the partay's, but I can vouch for the fine treatment
wayward traveling biker scum can receive from Skiv and Penny when out
on the road. Masters of fine hospitality, they are.
--
Grumpy
Babe v2.1 2000 FLSTC
DOF -2, BS 193, CVNS G&W, Cult of Mac
"*Ploink* the clueless!" ..-. -.-- -.-- ..-. ..-.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Tue Jan 6 03:51:15 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.30624 Sekunden |