|
Motorcycles » rec.motorcycles.harley » Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it...
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778419 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:14 |
|
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:54:54 GMT, Chilly <wjghouse [at] nospam.yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even
>> Schmoe'll share a bottle with her.
Dana Taramina wrote:
> And if she were me, she'd smack him over the head with it.
You'd get better results hitting me in the ass with it. <sfsf>
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778420 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:16 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:31:34 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as
>> fact as to what/who she's claimed to be. Now, for the real
>> question, which regular was it that convinced her that it would be a
>> good idea to come clean with a new intro in order to get a fresh
>> start only to have it backfire? I'm not expecting anyone to answer
>> that, but damned, did that ever bite her in the ass.
>
> Well, someone bit her in the ass, but I think coming clean had nothing
> to do with it. Plain old bad manners had lots to do with it. And the
> overwhelming stench of testosterone had a lot to do with it.
Bullshit. A guy would get the exact same responses and has. Your comments
reek of reverse sexism. I'm a little hurt. <g>
Seriously, you keep talking about this like it's a man against woman thread.
It really isn't. Get over it.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778421 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:18 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:48:07 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go,
>> and in a day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let
>> it go
>
> Don't count on it.
Yeah yeah we heard ya the 3rd time, no invitiations to your party. I'll have
to fill my schedule elsewhere.
4
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778423 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:23 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>There's probably a
> reason why Russ is the funniest biker in the world.
Sooooo you're not quitting your day job?
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778424 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:29 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> Dana Taramina wrote:
> > What
> > I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because they
> > got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story and are
> > embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
> > chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
>
>
> That is a foolish insult that should be below you. It's beyond a specific
> response.
>
BBBBBWWWWWWAAAAAAaaahhhhhhahahahahahaha!
<wiping tears from my eyes>
Schmoe, you and the other "non-defenders" are friggin' killin' me here.
The clouds of irony are so damn thick I'm choking on it...
Aw christ, I gotta take a walk and get my breath back.
--
Bill C. <git 'em Dana!>
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778425 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:29 |
|
Tud wrote:
> Schmoe wrote:
>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>
>>> Life is way too short to be as
>>> pissed off about this as you all are.
>>
>> Not even a teency, weency bit.
>
> That does seem to be a major misconception. It would take a lot more
> than some anonymous troll to get my ire up, but poking said troll can
> certainly be good for some laughs. It's a sport that goes waaay back
> in here. The only ones I've seen get pissed off are Becky's
> defenders, well, probably not Roach or dp, disappointed by some self
> imposed line being crossed perhaps, but not pissed off.
>
> Well I guess any chance of scoring with Shriley's kids has long since
> passed.
FYYFF. That's the last keyboard you're bringing to ruin.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778426 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:33 |
|
Tud wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Tud wrote:
>>> big al wrote:
>>>> Cuckoo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I sure dunno if Becky/Boo/Shirley is a troll or not, but I know one
>>>>> thing...she sure has the regulars fightin'.
>>>>> Damn.
>>>>> Isn't that what trolls do?
>>>>> /me walks away shaking head
>>>>> Kelli
>>>>> '96FXDzebra
>>>>> BS#261/SLOB#17
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Fighting? This ain't fighting... I thought you owned a bar.
>>> Simply a little spirited discussion s'all.
>>>
>> Are you still working?
>
> When I posted that I had been home for about 3 hours and working from there,
> hadn't gone to sleep yet, so it would have been after 38 hours of no sleep,
> what would make you ask? <g>
I was wondering not only why but how you could still be asleep. The last
couple of those shifts I pulled last year put me out and kept me out
like as soon as I hit the pillow. Must be the advantage of yoot :)
>
> You got your violin handy Dana?
>
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778432 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:04 |
|
"Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net> wrote in message
news:Umrtg.3172$EX5.1084 [at] fe11.lga...
>>If Shirley shows up here in September, I'll
>> check her out.
>
> <insert Jojo joke here> (sorry, I couldn't resist, devil made me...)
Schmoe...I'm trying to stay outta this...ok?
And Dana, if your reading, there is more personal involvement than a couple
of hours
or a few keystrokes. I'm making friends here, or at least think I am. I'm
hoping you are one
of them. There are quite a few of you here that I really hope to meet
someday.
And yes, if you jumped on tomorrow and said you were someone else and
everything was
a ruse for some higher purpose, I'd be pissed. I might actually say
something crass, mean and tacky.
(which I did). Which I regret, simply because I don't like to be a crass,
mean and tacky person.
I think it was schmoe (no time to go back and look) that suggested we let it
all go.
Just step up to the bar with the face we've got on right now, have a drink,
and start fresh.
The mojo in this corner of the bar has gone bad....let's turn it around.
Next rounds on me! (and yes schmoe, I did that shot you put on the bar
yesterday...smooth!)
jojo
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778433 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:10 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> There's probably a
>> reason why Russ is the funniest biker in the world.
>
>
> Sooooo you're not quitting your day job?
>
>
Fawk - if it were just a day job I'd not be dragging my ass all the
time. Being in IT is like having a new born baby in the room.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778434 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:13 |
|
spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
> Schmoe wrote:
>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>> What
>>> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because
>>> they got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story
>>> and are embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that you
>>> had a real chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
>>
>>
>> That is a foolish insult that should be below you. It's beyond a
>> specific response.
>>
>
>
> BBBBBWWWWWWAAAAAAaaahhhhhhahahahahahaha!
>
> <wiping tears from my eyes>
>
> Schmoe, you and the other "non-defenders" are friggin' killin' me
> here.
>
>
> The clouds of irony are so damn thick I'm choking on it...
>
> Aw christ, I gotta take a walk and get my breath back.
When ya get back, feel free to 'splain yerself. Clouds of irony? Sounds like
a bad 80's garage rock band.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778435 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:16 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Schmoe wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> There's probably a
>>> reason why Russ is the funniest biker in the world.
>>
>>
>> Sooooo you're not quitting your day job?
>>
>>
> Fawk - if it were just a day job I'd not be dragging my ass all the
> time. Being in IT is like having a new born baby in the room.
.....but without the cute little face?
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778438 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:28 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Schmoe wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> There's probably a
>>> reason why Russ is the funniest biker in the world.
>>
>>
>> Sooooo you're not quitting your day job?
>>
> Fawk - if it were just a day job I'd not be dragging my ass all the
> time. Being in IT is like having a new born baby in the room.
Dontcha love it........
For years "my" IT department told me I was on my own since I
was using "non-standard" software. Well it WAS a database
program with a windows GUI.........<sfsf>
Guess they were REALLY glad when I finally got rid of the
old RISC6000 box running AIX and migrated all my stuff to
PC's on their network.
Finally got them to concede that the network was
theirs.....the server was theirs, etc. Although it was like
pulling teeth to get them to NOT run the server backup at
8PM ("But nobody is working then")......hadta remind them we
were open from 6 am till midnight (2/3's of our staff
on-site from 3:330pm till midnight).....and that turning on
the backup at 8pm made the system slow to a frikkin crawl.
Then I pointed out that my databases (which they were
backing up) were about twice the size of the tapes they were
using........so they fired up an old server and backed my
stuff up to another server (????). <sfsf>.
They offered me a job one time as a tech.....had to decline
and pointed out I was already at a higher pay grade than
their IT managers (not the Director though)...<sfsf>
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778449 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:18 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
> > Schmoe wrote:
> >> Dana Taramina wrote:
> >>> What
> >>> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because
> >>> they got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story
> >>> and are embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that you
> >>> had a real chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
> >>
> >>
> >> That is a foolish insult that should be below you. It's beyond a
> >> specific response.
> >>
> >
> >
> > BBBBBWWWWWWAAAAAAaaahhhhhhahahahahahaha!
> >
> > <wiping tears from my eyes>
> >
> > Schmoe, you and the other "non-defenders" are friggin' killin' me
> > here.
> >
> >
> > The clouds of irony are so damn thick I'm choking on it...
> >
> > Aw christ, I gotta take a walk and get my breath back.
>
>
> When ya get back, feel free to 'splain yerself.
I'm tempted to just say "That is a foolish insult that should be below
you. It's beyond a specific response."
But, at the moment, that appears to be too subtle for this crowd. So
let me break it down for ya.
Ironic in the context of your post because:
1. The statement itself is a "foolish insult" in that you are presuming
to give Dana a dressing down.
Ironic in the context of this already bizaar thread in that:
1 There have been plenty of "Foolish insult<s>" hurled in this thread,
but that didn't stop the poster(s) from pushing the send button(s) over
and over again (count up the number of your responses in this thread
alone)
2 Most of those responses "should be below <the originator>", again
that didn't stop them from showing even a modicum of restraint
3 All were of those were, themselves, "Beyond a specific response", but
man did they respond anyway, as you did above with your backhanded
"non-response"
> Clouds of irony? Sounds like
> a bad 80's garage rock band.
It *is* kinda catchy ain't it?
--
Bill C. <now opening for Timmy & The Lords Of The Underworld...>
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778451 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:33 |
|
spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
> Schmoe wrote:
>> spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
>>> Schmoe wrote:
>>>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>>>> What
>>>>> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because
>>>>> they got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story
>>>>> and are embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that
>>>>> you had a real chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is a foolish insult that should be below you. It's beyond a
>>>> specific response.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BBBBBWWWWWWAAAAAAaaahhhhhhahahahahahaha!
>>>
>>> <wiping tears from my eyes>
>>>
>>> Schmoe, you and the other "non-defenders" are friggin' killin' me
>>> here.
>>>
>>>
>>> The clouds of irony are so damn thick I'm choking on it...
>>>
>>> Aw christ, I gotta take a walk and get my breath back.
>>
>>
>> When ya get back, feel free to 'splain yerself.
>
> I'm tempted to just say "That is a foolish insult that should be below
> you. It's beyond a specific response."
>
> But, at the moment, that appears to be too subtle for this crowd. So
> let me break it down for ya.
>
> Ironic in the context of your post because:
>
> 1. The statement itself is a "foolish insult" in that you are
> presuming to give Dana a dressing down.
>
> Ironic in the context of this already bizaar thread in that:
>
> 1 There have been plenty of "Foolish insult<s>" hurled in this thread,
> but that didn't stop the poster(s) from pushing the send button(s)
> over and over again (count up the number of your responses in this
> thread alone)
>
> 2 Most of those responses "should be below <the originator>", again
> that didn't stop them from showing even a modicum of restraint
>
> 3 All were of those were, themselves, "Beyond a specific response",
> but man did they respond anyway, as you did above with your backhanded
> "non-response"
Weellll, I disagree so the irony is lost on me but thanks for the follow up.
Reviewing my posts, I could have been much more insulting but than again,
I'm from NY and we have a higher barometer for sarcastic barbs than the
national average <though Snarl is really quite good for a PNWBS>.
>> Clouds of irony? Sounds like
>> a bad 80's garage rock band.
>
> It *is* kinda catchy ain't it?
Not bad but we'd need to get some poofy hair, eye make-up and an Allesis
drum machine.
--
Bruce... #128 BS#224 KOTFAQ http://www.rmhfaq.com
'06 Ultra
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778454 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:39 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
>
>>Schmoe wrote:
>>>Clouds of irony? Sounds like
>>>a bad 80's garage rock band.
>>
>>It *is* kinda catchy ain't it?
> Not bad but we'd need to get some poofy hair, eye make-up and an Allesis
> drum machine.
I got the latter. http://www.alesis.com/products/sr16/
It's a killer little machine.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778455 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:43 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
>> Schmoe wrote:
>>> spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
>>>> Schmoe wrote:
>>>>> Dana Taramina wrote:
>>>>>> What
>>>>>> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because
>>>>>> they got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story
>>>>>> and are embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that
>>>>>> you had a real chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a foolish insult that should be below you. It's beyond a
>>>>> specific response.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BBBBBWWWWWWAAAAAAaaahhhhhhahahahahahaha!
>>>>
>>>> <wiping tears from my eyes>
>>>>
>>>> Schmoe, you and the other "non-defenders" are friggin' killin' me
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The clouds of irony are so damn thick I'm choking on it...
>>>>
>>>> Aw christ, I gotta take a walk and get my breath back.
>>>
>>> When ya get back, feel free to 'splain yerself.
>> I'm tempted to just say "That is a foolish insult that should be below
>> you. It's beyond a specific response."
>>
>> But, at the moment, that appears to be too subtle for this crowd. So
>> let me break it down for ya.
>>
>> Ironic in the context of your post because:
>>
>> 1. The statement itself is a "foolish insult" in that you are
>> presuming to give Dana a dressing down.
>>
>> Ironic in the context of this already bizaar thread in that:
>>
>> 1 There have been plenty of "Foolish insult<s>" hurled in this thread,
>> but that didn't stop the poster(s) from pushing the send button(s)
>> over and over again (count up the number of your responses in this
>> thread alone)
>>
>> 2 Most of those responses "should be below <the originator>", again
>> that didn't stop them from showing even a modicum of restraint
>>
>> 3 All were of those were, themselves, "Beyond a specific response",
>> but man did they respond anyway, as you did above with your backhanded
>> "non-response"
>
> Weellll, I disagree so the irony is lost on me but thanks for the follow up.
> Reviewing my posts, I could have been much more insulting but than again,
> I'm from NY and we have a higher barometer for sarcastic barbs than the
> national average <though Snarl is really quite good for a PNWBS>.
>
>
>>> Clouds of irony? Sounds like
>>> a bad 80's garage rock band.
>> It *is* kinda catchy ain't it?
>
>
> Not bad but we'd need to get some poofy hair, eye make-up and an Allesis
> drum machine.
>
>
>
No self-respecting 80's garage band would perform w/o one of these:
http://tinyurl.com/z24cl
Okay, maybe '70's garage band. Disco fever!
--
BS, yes I said "BS" 205
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778456 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:46 |
|
roach wrote:
<snip>
> Oh My God! It's INITA!
There goes the brand new Dell keyboard!
--
Traci aka sybil AH# 122 BS# 231
"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after, it's a reckoning."
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzer842t/AH122/AH122.html
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778458 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:47 |
|
TL Mitchell wrote:
> "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> wrote
>
>>> EKIII a few years ago when some crackhead in the next
> campsite was beating on his girlfriend. We took care of that
> real quick. <<
>
> Mob intervention at it's finest! Next time we need torches.......
Shoulda let Taz take care of it.
heh
--
Traci aka sybil AH# 122 BS# 231
"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after, it's a reckoning."
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzer842t/AH122/AH122.html
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778459 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:48 |
|
George Porter Jr. wrote:
> I got the latter. http://www.alesis.com/products/sr16/
> It's a killer little machine.
Me too. Used it a ton in the 80's. :)
Now it collects dust. I need to break that puppy out for a spin. Problem is
we've got a full kit in the LR now which is much more tempting to play.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778460 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:53 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> George Porter Jr. wrote:
>
>
>>I got the latter. http://www.alesis.com/products/sr16/
>> It's a killer little machine.
>
>
> Me too. Used it a ton in the 80's. :)
>
> Now it collects dust. I need to break that puppy out for a spin. Problem is
> we've got a full kit in the LR now which is much more tempting to play.
I don't have the room for a kit, and then, all the mikes I would have to
buy to record.. too pricey.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778461 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:53 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> big al wrote:
>> SteveI wrote:
>>> Chilly wrote:
>>>> "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
>>>>
>>>>> "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that
>>>>>> ever bite her in the ass.
>>>>> Can't argue with that.
>>>>
>>>> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even
>>>> Schmoe'll share a bottle with her. Heh, if she has any nads, she'll
>>>> show up wearing an Amsoil t shirt...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> With a BIG badge that says:
>>>
>>> "I am NOT Dave Stone"
>>>
>>
>> Well she can't wear one that says "I stepped all over my dick,
>> big-time in rmh" <g>
>>
>> Or, can she?
>>
>
> I bet if you made one and presented it person she'd wear it :)
Oh no, I have _just_ the shirt for this.
I was modeling it at one of the Vermort's. I'll have it at Eddie's and it's
_all_ hers.
--
Traci aka sybil AH# 122 BS# 231
"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after, it's a reckoning."
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzer842t/AH122/AH122.html
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778462 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:57 |
|
spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
> Schmoe wrote:
<big ol' snip>
>> When ya get back, feel free to 'splain yerself.
>
> I'm tempted to just say "That is a foolish insult that should be below
> you. It's beyond a specific response."
I'm tempted to say, "You weren't just temped to say it, you actually
succumbed to the temptation." <g>
>> Clouds of irony? Sounds like
>> a bad 80's garage rock band.
>
> It *is* kinda catchy ain't it?
Sounds more "new wave" to me, but yea, it's catchy. Kinda.
--
Mike | Why is lemon juice made with
'04 FLHTCUI | artificial flavor, and dishwashing
BS#247 | liquid made with real lemons?
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778463 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:57 |
|
"Schmoe" wrote:
> spacecriter (Bill C) wrote:
>> Schmoe wrote:
>
>>> Clouds of irony? Sounds like
>>> a bad 80's garage rock band.
>>
>> It *is* kinda catchy ain't it?
>
>
> Not bad but we'd need to get some poofy hair, eye make-up and an Allesis
> drum machine.
Don't forget the Spandex. And Piercings.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778464 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:59 |
|
She wrote:
> And sure I can
> wear a t-shirt saying I stepped all over my dick (I don't actually have
> one, but I do have balls).
>
<general statement> Castration is such an ugly thing. But I hear it's
becoming the treatment of choice among many sex offenders.
--
BS205 the "you ain't gettin' mine!" Slug
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778465 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 18:10 |
|
DM at work wrote:
> Beckyboo wrote:
>
>>
>> And if my intro is all the BS that some claim it to be...then have I
>> not earned a BS patch already? Just have to show up, right?
>>
> Not even a fucking clue. Go back and do some studying.
>
> Fins BS#221
Ya mean this part?
"getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another slug.
Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number you have
to write up a story describing how you got that number."
--
BS, yes I said PNWBS "BS" number 205
http://eddiekieger.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778467 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 18:26 |
|
big al wrote:
> DM at work wrote:
>> Beckyboo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And if my intro is all the BS that some claim it to be...then have I
>>> not earned a BS patch already? Just have to show up, right?
>>>
>> Not even a fucking clue. Go back and do some studying.
>>
>> Fins BS#221
>
> Ya mean this part?
>
> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another slug.
> Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number you have
> to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>
Sorry Al, the Len job is already taken. No more spoonfeeding the clueless.
Let's at least stick to the rule on this one.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778487 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 20:04 |
|
big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
> DM at work wrote:
>> Beckyboo wrote:
>>
>>> And if my intro is all the BS that some claim it to be...then have I
>>> not earned a BS patch already? Just have to show up, right?
>>>
>> Not even a fucking clue. Go back and do some studying.
>>
> Ya mean this part?
>
> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another slug.
> Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number you have
> to write up a story describing how you got that number."
That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By doing
so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and I trust
them." That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't let just any
slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
--
Chilly BS#226
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778489 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 20:13 |
|
Chilly wrote:
> big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
>> Ya mean this part?
>>
>> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another
>> slug. Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number
>> you have to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>
> That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By
> doing so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and
> I trust them." That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't
> let just any slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
Well, color me confused.
I was told ya' had to ride with a slug, post a slime report, then get a
number.
Then I read the FAQ and it said yer supposed to post a report after
getting a number.
Now yer saying dp has to be emailed every time.
Methinks the FAQs need some clarification. Eventually. Maybe.
--
Mike
BS#247
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778493 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 20:32 |
|
Chilly sed:
>By doing so, a Slug is essentially saying,
>"I rode with this person, and I trust them."
>That's where the trust network gets formed.
>Can't let just any slimeball claim a BS number.
>Wouldn't be prudent.
BWAHAHAHAHA!
ASSHOLE#104 Len
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778498 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 20:46 |
|
Chilly wrote:
> big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
>
>> DM at work wrote:
>>> Beckyboo wrote:
>>>
>>>> And if my intro is all the BS that some claim it to be...then have
>>>> I not earned a BS patch already? Just have to show up, right?
>>>>
>>> Not even a fucking clue. Go back and do some studying.
>>>
>> Ya mean this part?
>>
>> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another
>> slug. Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number
>> you have to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>
> That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By
> doing so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and
> I trust them."
I didn't realize the slugs were so elitist. *I*, in my own little way of
interpreting thinks, was under the impression that it just took a IRL for a
"bs" number and riding with another slug for a "BS" number. No trust issues
involved, just people getting together. You do realize that Gidiot has one
don't you?
>That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't
> let just any slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
I have to join Len on this one, BWAHAHAHAHAHAA. See above.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778502 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:15 |
|
"Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> sed:
> Chilly wrote:
>> big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
>>>
>>> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another
>>> slug. Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number
>>> you have to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>>
>> That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By
>> doing so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and
>> I trust them."
>
> I didn't realize the slugs were so elitist. *I*, in my own little way
> of interpreting thinks, was under the impression that it just took a
> IRL for a "bs" number and riding with another slug for a "BS" number.
> No trust issues involved, just people getting together. You do
> realize that Gidiot has one don't you?
>
>> That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't
>> let just any slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
>
> I have to join Len on this one, BWAHAHAHAHAHAA. See above.
Yeah, I didn't make this up. I *know* I read it someplace. Shirley it
ain't in the Offishual Slug Rules(tm). Could be a fabrication in my mind -
such as it is. (shrug)
Wisht it were so tho.
--
Chilly BS#226
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778504 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:22 |
|
Tinman wrote:
> Chilly wrote:
>> big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
>>> Ya mean this part?
>>>
>>> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another
>>> slug. Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number
>>> you have to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>> That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By
>> doing so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and
>> I trust them." That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't
>> let just any slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
>
> Well, color me confused.
>
> I was told ya' had to ride with a slug, post a slime report, then get a
> number.
>
> Then I read the FAQ and it said yer supposed to post a report after
> getting a number.
>
> Now yer saying dp has to be emailed every time.
>
> Methinks the FAQs need some clarification. Eventually. Maybe.
>
>
Maybe. But here's how it works. First and only rule is, there's no
rules. That right there is what makes it work. Get there on more than
three wheels or less than 1? You get a bs#. Anything else is a BS#. You
don't have to ride together - you can all ride from afar to a common
location. It ain't the ride, its the destination. One of those rare
times. So everyone disperses and something has to happen next. Somebody
has to tell the Tooberdude a number is due or else a miracle has to
occur. So if you believe in miracles, do not send an email to the
Tooberdude! If you don't believe in miracles, or do but think once every
2000 years is too long to wait, you send the T guy a message. The T guy
makes a note in the offishual list of slugs and sends a message to the
slimeee. At this point the slimeee uses their brand spanky new number in
a slime report right here in r.m.h for all the world to see.
What you cannot depend on in any of the communication is r.m.h because
it is incredibly unreliable and unvisited by me (I be the T guy) for
long stretches owing to my having a life (well, wife) and getting busy
from time to time. A problem that comes up will be a slime heads up but
no email addy, and nothing but a nick from r.m.h and a munged email addy
that doesn't work. This can get things backed up like cheap chili and
warm beer.
Here's where the trust comes in - I have to send a note to a perfect
stranger using an email address I got from a nearly perfect stranger
whom I've met in this bar. Some day somebody is going to send me the
address of Sister Mary Elephant from the First Church of the Gooey Death
and Discount House of Worship out of Del Rio, Texas, and I'm going to
send the good Sister a slug invite, and the next thing that's going to
happen is Padre Guido from the enforcement wing of the FCGDDHW is going
to visit and want an accounting of why I'm sending suggestive messages
to Sister Elephant.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778505 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:37 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tinman wrote:
<snippage occured>
>>
>> Methinks the FAQs need some clarification. Eventually. Maybe.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe. But here's how it works. First and only rule is, there's no
> rules. That right there is what makes it work. Get there on more than
> three wheels or less than 1? You get a bs#. Anything else is a BS#.
> You don't have to ride together - you can all ride from afar to a
> common location. It ain't the ride, its the destination. One of those
> rare times. So everyone disperses and something has to happen next.
> Somebody has to tell the Tooberdude a number is due or else a miracle
> has to occur. So if you believe in miracles, do not send an email to
> the Tooberdude! If you don't believe in miracles, or do but think
> once every 2000 years is too long to wait, you send the T guy a
> message. The T guy makes a note in the offishual list of slugs and
> sends a message to the slimeee. At this point the slimeee uses their
> brand spanky new number in a slime report right here in r.m.h for all
> the world to see.
> What you cannot depend on in any of the communication is r.m.h because
> it is incredibly unreliable and unvisited by me (I be the T guy) for
> long stretches owing to my having a life (well, wife) and getting busy
> from time to time. A problem that comes up will be a slime heads up
> but no email addy, and nothing but a nick from r.m.h and a munged
> email addy that doesn't work. This can get things backed up like
> cheap chili and warm beer.
>
> Here's where the trust comes in - I have to send a note to a perfect
> stranger using an email address I got from a nearly perfect stranger
> whom I've met in this bar. Some day somebody is going to send me the
> address of Sister Mary Elephant from the First Church of the Gooey
> Death and Discount House of Worship out of Del Rio, Texas, and I'm
> going to send the good Sister a slug invite, and the next thing
> that's going to happen is Padre Guido from the enforcement wing of
> the FCGDDHW is going to visit and want an accounting of why I'm
> sending suggestive messages to Sister Elephant.
Couldn't snip a bit of your post, dp! (Bruce, you getting this?)
Now I realize I already posted about my first slugly encounter, but just
to make it an awefishial after-BS# story...
One day, a long time ago (OK, it wuz in '04), I met SteveI in AZ to ride
up to SNIFF with. I wuz slimed, at a truck-stop Wendy's no less!!!
A few hours later, in true slugly fashion, Steve and I stopped for gas
when neither of us needed it. Right there in that gas station's parking
lot were none other than Harlista and JC (Mutt). I wuz slimed again,
this time it twasn't coming off!
The four of us rode up to Jackson together, stopping in Bishop, CA for
the night--not to mention a hammmmbbbburger and a beer of two.
The next day, after riding over Tioga pass in Yosemite, we made it into
Jackson. My first IRL "event," if you will.
There you have it. Now, finally, I can wash the damn bike. <sfsf>
--
Mike
BS#247
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778507 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:41 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tinman wrote:
>> Chilly wrote:
>>> big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
>>>> Ya mean this part?
>>>>
>>>> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another
>>>> slug. Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number
>>>> you have to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>>> That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By
>>> doing so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and
>>> I trust them." That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't
>>> let just any slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
>>
>> Well, color me confused.
>>
>> I was told ya' had to ride with a slug, post a slime report, then get
>> a number.
>>
>> Then I read the FAQ and it said yer supposed to post a report after
>> getting a number.
>>
>> Now yer saying dp has to be emailed every time.
>>
>> Methinks the FAQs need some clarification. Eventually. Maybe.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe. But here's how it works. First and only rule is, there's no
> rules. That right there is what makes it work. Get there on more than
> three wheels or less than 1? You get a bs#. Anything else is a BS#. You
> don't have to ride together - you can all ride from afar to a common
> location. It ain't the ride, its the destination. One of those rare
> times. So everyone disperses and something has to happen next. Somebody
> has to tell the Tooberdude a number is due or else a miracle has to
> occur. So if you believe in miracles, do not send an email to the
> Tooberdude! If you don't believe in miracles, or do but think once every
> 2000 years is too long to wait, you send the T guy a message. The T guy
> makes a note in the offishual list of slugs and sends a message to the
> slimeee. At this point the slimeee uses their brand spanky new number in
> a slime report right here in r.m.h for all the world to see.
>
> What you cannot depend on in any of the communication is r.m.h because
> it is incredibly unreliable and unvisited by me (I be the T guy) for
> long stretches owing to my having a life (well, wife) and getting busy
> from time to time. A problem that comes up will be a slime heads up but
> no email addy, and nothing but a nick from r.m.h and a munged email addy
> that doesn't work. This can get things backed up like cheap chili and
> warm beer.
>
> Here's where the trust comes in - I have to send a note to a perfect
> stranger using an email address I got from a nearly perfect stranger
> whom I've met in this bar. Some day somebody is going to send me the
> address of Sister Mary Elephant from the First Church of the Gooey Death
> and Discount House of Worship out of Del Rio, Texas, and I'm going to
> send the good Sister a slug invite, and the next thing that's going to
> happen is Padre Guido from the enforcement wing of the FCGDDHW is going
> to visit and want an accounting of why I'm sending suggestive messages
> to Sister Elephant.
>
> dp
Damn send button went off when I was cleaning it. To continue...
So what that all means is, there's no screening, no yea's or nay's. If a
nom comes up for a number, a number is cut. No second guessing. The
trust is deferred entirely to the slimer. That said, the process is less
than perfect and slimees can slip between the cracks. I'm working on a
web page that corrects that. See more at waiting for miracles.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778508 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:42 |
|
Tinman wrote:
> The next day, after riding over Tioga pass in Yosemite, we made it into
> Jackson. My first IRL "event," if you will.
>
> There you have it. Now, finally, I can wash the damn bike. <sfsf>
>
>
Won't help. The stuff doesn't come off.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778509 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:51 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Tinman wrote:
>>> Chilly wrote:
>>>> big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> sed:
>>>>> Ya mean this part?
>>>>>
>>>>> "getting a BS# requires only that you meet and ride with another
>>>>> slug. Oh, and there's this rule - once you've been assigned a number
>>>>> you have to write up a story describing how you got that number."
>>>> That, and the one doing the sliming is to write the Tooberdude. By
>>>> doing so, a Slug is essentially saying, "I rode with this person, and
>>>> I trust them." That's where the trust network gets formed. Can't
>>>> let just any slimeball claim a BS number. Wouldn't be prudent.
>>>
>>> Well, color me confused.
>>>
>>> I was told ya' had to ride with a slug, post a slime report, then get
>>> a number.
>>>
>>> Then I read the FAQ and it said yer supposed to post a report after
>>> getting a number.
>>>
>>> Now yer saying dp has to be emailed every time.
>>>
>>> Methinks the FAQs need some clarification. Eventually. Maybe.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Maybe. But here's how it works. First and only rule is, there's no
>> rules. That right there is what makes it work. Get there on more than
>> three wheels or less than 1? You get a bs#. Anything else is a BS#.
>> You don't have to ride together - you can all ride from afar to a
>> common location. It ain't the ride, its the destination. One of those
>> rare times. So everyone disperses and something has to happen next.
>> Somebody has to tell the Tooberdude a number is due or else a miracle
>> has to occur. So if you believe in miracles, do not send an email to
>> the Tooberdude! If you don't believe in miracles, or do but think once
>> every 2000 years is too long to wait, you send the T guy a message.
>> The T guy makes a note in the offishual list of slugs and sends a
>> message to the slimeee. At this point the slimeee uses their brand
>> spanky new number in a slime report right here in r.m.h for all the
>> world to see.
>>
>> What you cannot depend on in any of the communication is r.m.h because
>> it is incredibly unreliable and unvisited by me (I be the T guy) for
>> long stretches owing to my having a life (well, wife) and getting busy
>> from time to time. A problem that comes up will be a slime heads up
>> but no email addy, and nothing but a nick from r.m.h and a munged
>> email addy that doesn't work. This can get things backed up like cheap
>> chili and warm beer.
>>
>> Here's where the trust comes in - I have to send a note to a perfect
>> stranger using an email address I got from a nearly perfect stranger
>> whom I've met in this bar. Some day somebody is going to send me the
>> address of Sister Mary Elephant from the First Church of the Gooey
>> Death and Discount House of Worship out of Del Rio, Texas, and I'm
>> going to send the good Sister a slug invite, and the next thing that's
>> going to happen is Padre Guido from the enforcement wing of the
>> FCGDDHW is going to visit and want an accounting of why I'm sending
>> suggestive messages to Sister Elephant.
>>
>> dp
>
> Damn send button went off when I was cleaning it. To continue...
>
> So what that all means is, there's no screening, no yea's or nay's. If a
> nom comes up for a number, a number is cut. No second guessing. The
> trust is deferred entirely to the slimer. That said, the process is less
> than perfect and slimees can slip between the cracks. I'm working on a
> web page that corrects that. See more at waiting for miracles.
>
> dp
Ok - full disclosure. I sed above there's only one rule and that is
there's no rules and it's true. The rest of the truth is, the only other
rule is that we can make up rules on the spot which is why the first
rule is so important. It is this critical sleight of rule crafting
genius that allows us to add that riding into a sliming on a P-pad will
get you a bs#.
dp .. the 'I reserve the right to amend and extend my remarks' Tooberdude
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778511 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:57 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>the process is less than perfect and slimees can slip between the cracks. I'm working on >a web page that corrects that. See more at waiting for miracles.
I tried www.waitingformiracles.com, but it's some poor woman whose
husband suffers from PE. Or maybe she's suffering from it -- things
weren't exactly clear.
Eh? Oh. Heh...
Aren't we going to vote on this? I thought that was supposed to be the
next step. Or was that over on the super-secret P.O.R.K. list?
Skiv :)=)} AH 41 BS 32 SENS IBA DoD IRF
'89 XL Bobster "StraKat": Shake. Rattle. Roll. Repeat.
"Jesus! Get him a patch." -- PepperLady
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778513 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:41 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Some day somebody is going to send me the
> address of Sister Mary Elephant from the First Church of the Gooey Death
> and Discount House of Worship out of Del Rio, Texas, and I'm going to
> send the good Sister a slug invite, and the next thing that's going to
> happen is Padre Guido from the enforcement wing of the FCGDDHW is going
> to visit and want an accounting of why I'm sending suggestive messages
> to Sister Elephant.
Cause you wanna bend her over a pinball machine?
--
JMark
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778516 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 22:10 |
|
Purple Hays wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> the process is less than perfect and slimees can slip between the cracks. I'm working on >a web page that corrects that. See more at waiting for miracles.
>
> I tried www.waitingformiracles.com, but it's some poor woman whose
> husband suffers from PE. Or maybe she's suffering from it -- things
> weren't exactly clear.
>
> Eh? Oh. Heh...
>
> Aren't we going to vote on this? I thought that was supposed to be the
> next step. Or was that over on the super-secret P.O.R.K. list?
Definitely no voting. We get a blessing from down Del Rio way by the
Right Reverend Billy Sol Hardon who runs the discount baptismal carwash
out on the Tammy Faye Baker highway. The secret P.O.R.K. list is for the
'Fellowship and Brotherhood of the Pink Pig' faction. The mascot is the
lil pink porker here: http://www.traegerindustries.com/grill4.htm#1
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778518 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 22:29 |
|
JMark wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> Some day somebody is going to send me the address of Sister Mary
>> Elephant from the First Church of the Gooey Death and Discount House
>> of Worship out of Del Rio, Texas, and I'm going to send the good
>> Sister a slug invite, and the next thing that's going to happen is
>> Padre Guido from the enforcement wing of the FCGDDHW is going to visit
>> and want an accounting of why I'm sending suggestive messages to
>> Sister Elephant.
>
> Cause you wanna bend her over a pinball machine?
>
>
>
> --
> JMark
I'm more of a strolls in the rain, Pina Collada, soft music, quicky in
the stairwell kinda guy.
dp
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Tue Jan 6 09:18:42 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.19026 Sekunden |
