|
Motorcycles » rec.motorcycles.harley » Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it...
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778321 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 03:00 |
|
Purple Hays wrote:
> My personal all-round fave is Lagavulin 16 year -- but (as Rose
> Beranbaum would say) I adore the lovely quirkyness of Laphroaig. The
> 10 year is fantastic, but the 15 is everything a truly spiritual
> experience oughta be.
You have excellent taste. An extraordinary value that I've introduced and
made regular in more than one netscum household is Bowmore Legend. Can be
found generally in the $19-23 range and for my money is comp with Laphroaig
10. But neither bat an eye at Lagavulin 16.
--
Bruce... #128 BS#224 KOTFAQ http://www.rmhfaq.com
'06 Ultra
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778325 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 03:08 |
|
"dp" Writ:
> Shaggy wrote:
<snip>
>> You 2 gonna makeit by Kittysass?
>>
>> Gotta know how much beer to put in Mr Fridge.
>
> Yep - looks like Short Ribs can head out after work on Friday, so around
> 8:30 pm or so in Kittyass with an early start. Long ways to Blackfoot.
So, which Friday?
--
Shag BS#245
The "Don't wanna be double bookin" Slug
'35VLD, '42EL, '78FLH, '88FLHTC, '04FLHTCI
Pull the plug to reply
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778327 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 03:16 |
|
"TL Mitchell" <tlmitchell99(MyJohnson) [at] earthlink.net> sed:
> "Chilly" <wjghouse [at] nospam.yahoo.com> wrote
>> "Beckyboo" <Beckyboo430 [at] aol.com> sed:
>>
>>> I have no idea where to find an Amsoil t-shirt but I bet if someone put
>>> it on the auction site, I'd be obligated to bid and fight to the death
>>> to be the winnah...
>>
>> Done!
>>
>> http://eddiekieger.com/cgi-bin/ek3auction.cgi?Clothing&1 153339947
>
> You sir, are always prepared!
Got the merit badge ...
--
Chilly BS#226
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778328 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 03:24 |
|
Tud wrote:
> big al wrote:
>> Cuckoo wrote:
>>
>>> I sure dunno if Becky/Boo/Shirley is a troll or not, but I know one
>>> thing...she sure has the regulars fightin'.
>>> Damn.
>>> Isn't that what trolls do?
>>> /me walks away shaking head
>>> Kelli
>>> '96FXDzebra
>>> BS#261/SLOB#17
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Fighting? This ain't fighting... I thought you owned a bar.
>
> Simply a little spirited discussion s'all.
>
Are you still working?
dp
|
|
|
| Re: On to better things... [message #778336 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 03:56 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Beckyboo wrote:
>>
>
> Cool yer' jets, cuz - no get all huhu, eh? Stay too much pilikia,
> already. :)
>
Mahalo brah......
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this ismy story and I'm sticking to it...) [message #778337 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 03:57 |
|
Tud wrote:
>
> Dysfunctional is our middle name.
>
Yeah, but we put the fun back in dysfunctional.....
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778338 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 04:00 |
|
roach wrote:
> SteveI (Irv) wrote:
>> Gotta say I don't think
>> I ever saw anyone apologize to Dave Stone for comments about
>> his mother, etc.,
>
> I did once.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/fxurh
>
> roach
>
What I get for thinkin'....
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778339 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 04:06 |
|
"big al" <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:44b58a20 [at] 127.0.0.1...
> Cuckoo wrote:
>
>>
>> I sure dunno if Becky/Boo/Shirley is a troll or not, but I know one
>> thing...she sure has the regulars fightin'.
>> Damn.
>> Isn't that what trolls do?
>> /me walks away shaking head
>> Kelli
>> '96FXDzebra
>> BS#261/SLOB#17
>>
>>
>>
>
> Fighting? This ain't fighting... I thought you owned a bar.
>
You're right. Nuthin' broken yet.
Carry on.
;-)
Kel
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778340 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 04:34 |
|
Spunky the Tuna wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:44:57 -0400, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> Spunky the Tuna wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:35:30 -0400, Dennis Peterson pontificated:
>>>
>>>> This is all exactly correct and I agree. And I hope she does come to the
>>>> EKIII run, or at least is willing to hook up along the way so I can
>>>> apologize in person on behalf of r.m.h for the boorish treatment she's
>>>> received here.
>>> LIttle full of yourself, aren't you? Apologizing on behalf of r.m.h? What
>>> in the world makes you think that you have any right and/authority to do
>>> such
>>> a thing?
>> Yes I am, yes, and it is my inalienable right to say anything that pops
>> into my head.
>>
>>> You want to apologize on your own behalf? Spiffy. Knock yourself out. On
>>> behalf of r.m.h? Go fuck yourself.
>> Lemme get this straight because it has the potential for being circular.
>> I cannot appologize on behalf of r.m.h, but you can speak out against me
>> on behalf of r.m.h. Am I on the same page?
>
> Not at all. Did I say anywhere that I was speaking for r.m.h? No. I am a
> part of r.m.h and you do not speak for me, ergo you do not speak for r.m.h.
> I'da thought you were smart enough to get that far on your own.
Ok -- let's put this to rest because it's become one of the sillier
sidebars in an already nutty thread. I agree with you and did so even
before you spoke up - it is not possible for me to speak on behalf of
anyone because nobody has granted that to me. It was always a logical
impossibility. I really did think somebody would notice that and we'd
have a good chuckle but it didn't work out that way. I apologize (for
myself!) for raising the noise level with what I knew ahead of time to
be a folly. Perhaps without the other heated discussions co-habiting the
thread this would have been quickly picked up. There's probably a reason
why Russ is the funniest biker in the world.
dp
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this ismy story and I'm sticking to it...) [message #778347 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 05:28 |
|
Michael Hewitt wrote:
>>
>>> ..-. -.-- -.-- ..-. ..-.
>>
> And I just copied that shit from a friend <sfsf>
>
Oh, sure. NOW I'm your friend. Yas shoulda heard what Al and I said
'bout ya over steaks tonight.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this ismy story and I'm sticking to it...) [message #778348 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 05:29 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> Purple Hays wrote:
>> My personal all-round fave is Lagavulin 16 year -- but (as Rose
>> Beranbaum would say) I adore the lovely quirkyness of Laphroaig. The
>> 10 year is fantastic, but the 15 is everything a truly spiritual
>> experience oughta be.
>
> You have excellent taste. An extraordinary value that I've introduced and
> made regular in more than one netscum household is Bowmore Legend. Can be
> found generally in the $19-23 range and for my money is comp with Laphroaig
> 10. But neither bat an eye at Lagavulin 16.
>
Had some very nice Bowmore 15 t' other night. Nectar o' the gods.
Fins BS#221
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778349 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 05:32 |
|
On 12 Jul 2006 11:00:25 -0700, "Beckyboo" <Beckyboo430 [at] aol.com> wrote:
>
>Tinman wrote:
>> And, I might add, *I* ended it on a good note. (Well, assuming she knows
>> I wuz joking, am actually married, and couldn't possibly get involved
>> with her daughter.)
>
>While I was joking about you meeting Becky, just one more note here for
>you, why would I memorize your vitals or your posts? You are famous?
>
>In looking back now, I see that you got in trouble with someone with
>an"i" at the end of their name not too long ago either. If you were so
>joking why would you post a link to your website or picture for Becky
>to see? Now I am going to shut up for a good long time, but you should
>watch your marriage, and cherish it.
>
>And, I think you left out more of your Candi story than I left out of
>mine but I don't see anyone jumping all over you for that.... so yep,
>there's a double standard for sure, but it works both ways.
I have pretty much stayed out of this untill now, Beckyboo you are:
a) A liar
b) a fucking cunt
c) a lying fucking cunt
If you are one of her apologists, get over it or don't
Just my 02
Ironhorse, HSB#96, SENS BS
2001 Ultraclassic with Sidecar
96 Custom bucket of bolts (gone but not forgotten)
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778354 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:18 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 02:32:22 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>Be sure to spell my name right. ;-)
Oh, I think I can manage that.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778358 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:33 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:36:39 -0700, big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com>
wrote:
>Gimme a fuckin' break Dana. This person has lied about herself, made up
>idiotic stories about herself, imaginary relatives and friends (dead or
>alive) since the day she dropped through the door. Posted links to pics
>of other people's family on the net. Ugly? That's ugly. And totally
>uncalled for. Has anyone here bullshitted her about who they are?
>hasn't everyone offered her the benefit of the doubt? Even to the
>extent of inviting her to stay at their place like you have? Stand back
>and take a look at what's transpired. We're not the uglies you make us
>out to be.
And just what exactly is your investment in this relationship other
than a couple of hours behind your keyboard? You guys (and I mean this
in general, not you specifically) don't seem to mind that Panhead
changes his name 12 times a day and lies through his teeth constantly.
And not just Panhead, many of our other resident Trolls as well. What
I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because they
got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story and are
embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
chance with a beautiful 26 year old? Now you find out you may not and
are running around screaming "injustice!" and pissing on your own
feet. To what lengths would you go to find out where personal effects
were that had been stolen from you by some dirtbag? Personal effects
that were stolen from your dead sister? Anyone here would have done
exactly the same thing in the same situation. Don't believe that was
the situation? Big deal. You have NO personal investment in any of
this, as far as I can tell. NONE OF IT MATTERS. Her checks to Eddie
didn't bounce, that's the only thing that matters. And who I invite to
my house is *my* business. If Shirley shows up here in September, I'll
check her out. If she doesn't, I won't. I'm certainly not going to
fret about it between now and then. Life is way too short to be as
pissed off about this as you all are. Threatening to gang rape
someone's daughter is too far below even RMH for me to imagine.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778360 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:34 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:49:50 -0700, DM at work
<fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> wrote:
>Dana Taramina wrote:
>> And yes, I'm keeping
>> tabs on who's being ugly to her through this thread.
>>
>
>I've stayed out of this thread, but I just gotta ask. Why are you
>keeping tabs?
So I can refine my guest list for September.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778361 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:34 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:06:38 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>Dana Taramina wrote:
>> Tud wrote:
>>
>>> Just bend her over the pinball table and form a line, her mother
>>> will be doing the coat check.
>>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> How about we march out your daughter to do the coat check, Tud? Or
>> your mother? Or your sister?
>
>No daughter, and mother sister would only do as the coat check, too ugly for
>pinball machine lineup.
>
>> NO FUCKING SMILEY FACE.
>
>Then you're taking this much more seriously than me.
Yeah. Read what you wrote, Tud.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778362 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:37 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
> chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
Not any more......I married mine.
--
Steve Irving (Irv) - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
Under a black flag we shall sail.......
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778364 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:39 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:09:35 -0400, "Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net>
wrote:
>> She's been invited to my house in September where she's been assured
>> it's completely safe for her to be.
>
>Say hi to Stone when he shows up.
I have just what Stone needs if he shows up.
>
>>I'm quite convinced that *she's*
>> convinced it's not safe for her to go to the Eddie run. So don't be
>> surprised if she doesn't go there.
>
>She has done more to convince the hordes that she's/he's a troll than to
>convince otherwise. IMO, you've got this one wrong.
She doesn't have to convince anyone of anything. She owes you guys
*nothing*. And if I have this one wrong, so be it. It certainly
wouldn't be the first time. As I've said before, none of this is as
important as the "blood inthe water" attention it's getting.
>
>>The party at my house in September
>> is invite only, not "just show up". So we'll see. And yes, I'm keeping
>> tabs on who's being ugly to her through this thread.
>
>IMO you're giving to much credit to a hidden, probable troll with a history
>of lying in rmh than to the unhidden regulars.
As is my perogative. Just not the clique type, never have been.
> And your comment about
>keeping tabs is unneccessary since it's your home, your party and invitation
>only. It's tantamount to announcing a plonk.
Yeah, well, if you don't like the way I write, you certainly don't
have to read it.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778365 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:42 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:14:42 -0400, "Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net>
wrote:
>Nothing out of context about the Beckyboo quote where she offered to "haul"
>out one of her "VERY" single twin daughters to meet Tinman. Dana, I get the
>feeling you wouldn't be nearly as defensive if Beckyboo was a guy (which it
>very may well be). Have you even reviewed the inconsistencies in 'her'
>posts?
I've come to the defense of lots of guys here. And yes, I've read
everything Becky/Shirley's written. As I said in the very beginning, I
didn't think it all added up. And I didn't care. I still don't care.
*I'm* being very consistent.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778366 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:44 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:36:55 GMT, Chilly <wjghouse [at] nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
>I dunno Dana, I want to believe the reason she came clean is because she's
>grown to like this place, plans to show up irl, and knows she's got some
>bridges to repair. She's supported Eddie, I'm guessing she wants to be
>there for his BD, she's shown a tough carapace throughout this thread -
>taking her knocks, responding to adversity with humor ... I cannot imagine
>her showing up for Eddie's BD would be unsafe. Awkward around a few folks,
>(myself included) shirley, but unsafe? Nah.
I very much want to believe you're right. And if she's as Irish as she
says, from a Catholic *and* Protestant family, she's got nothing to
worry about. Thanks, Chilly.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778367 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:46 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:41:33 -0700, DM at work
<fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> wrote:
>How many IRL's have we had where things got out of hand?
I've been to a few. It's been a while though.
> At the most,
>someone might decline your handshake or offer of a beer. But that's the
>thing about this place, you can cuss each other all ya want in here but
>riding across country to meet that same person puts it in a different
>realm. Let's see if she shows up at Eddie's. I was gonna say the
>gauntlet has been thrown down, but instead just say the invitation has
>been extended.
ok. I was in a very, very crappy mood yesterday and reading what I
read didn't help. I'm not much better today. But I'm goig to try to be
less defensive. And maybe even less offensive.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778368 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:46 |
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:57:43 -0400, Spunky the Tuna
<spunkythetuna [at] bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:51:16 -0400, Dana Taramina wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:57:35 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just bend her over the pinball table and form a line, her mother will be
>>> doing the coat check.
>>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> How about we march out your daughter to do the coat check, Tud? Or
>> your mother? Or your sister?
>>
>> NO FUCKING SMILEY FACE.
>
>Oh, my! Looks like somebody had an extra helping of PissyFlakes!
A double. And I'm still not over it, thank you.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778371 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:49 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:31:34 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>Your facts leave out much of what we've all seen in here and know as fact as
>to what/who she's claimed to be. Now, for the real question, which regular
>was it that convinced her that it would be a good idea to come clean with a
>new intro in order to get a fresh start only to have it backfire? I'm not
>expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever bite her in the
>ass.
Well, someone bit her in the ass, but I think coming clean had nothing
to do with it. Plain old bad manners had lots to do with it. And the
overwhelming stench of testosterone had a lot to do with it.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778373 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:51 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:48:07 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go, and in a
>day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let it go
Don't count on it.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778374 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:52 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:54:54 GMT, Chilly <wjghouse [at] nospam.yahoo.com>
wrote:
>"roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
>
>> "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>
>> >I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever
>> >bite her in the ass.
>>
>> Can't argue with that.
>
>Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even Schmoe'll
>share a bottle with her.
And if she were me, she'd smack him over the head with it.
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778375 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:53 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:35:30 -0400, "Schmoe" <schmoe [at] schmoeville.net>
wrote:
>Tinman wrote:
>>> And, I might add, *I* ended it on a good note. (Well, assuming she
>>> knows I wuz joking, am actually married, and couldn't possibly get
>>> involved with her daughter.)
>
>Beckyboo wrote:
>> While I was joking about you meeting Becky, just one more note here
>> for you, why would I memorize your vitals or your posts? You are
>> famous?
>>
>> In looking back now, I see that you got in trouble with someone with
>> an"i" at the end of their name not too long ago either. If you were so
>> joking why would you post a link to your website or picture for Becky
>> to see? Now I am going to shut up for a good long time, but you should
>> watch your marriage, and cherish it.
>
>
><shaking head> Come on now, Defenders of the Boo. Read that post above! It's
>a beaut! She doesn't know anything about Tinman but feels comfortable giving
>him marital advice and implying that he would be unfaithful to his bride
>with her "daughter". DP? Dana? Anyone? <g>
>
>Shirley, an order please! (no not you) I think we've all had a little (very
>little) to ponder in this pretty little thread so I'm putting the card on
>the bar, lining up 40 shot glasses filled with Patron Silver and asking that
>we all mosey up, shoot a coupla of 'em down and share a group hug.
>Afterward, maybe Roach can serenade us with some nice Hawaiian melodies.
>
Yummy ... I like shots. Besides I have met Tinman he behaves ... I
don't ... but he was a good enabler for me :-D
--
CurlyMan "Chronically Late" PH#15 SLOB#1 BS#264 DOF#(absolutely)
100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
Temporary member of everyday is Saturday club ... again.
*Fuck Off to e-mail me.*
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778376 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:55 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:14:56 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>I'm a little weepy myself, of course mine could be attributed to it being
>3:11am here, I'm still sitting at my desk at work after 19 hours while
>watching the server recontruct a database as a result of a server crash, all
>while listing to the thunder and pouring rain outside the window while the
>Ural sits in the parking lot unprotected from the elements. At more than
>one point this evening I thought it was karma getting back at me for
>"crossing the line". ;-)
>
>I'm going to go find a couch in about 20 minutes in order to catch about 2
>hours sleep. You thought I crossed the line before, just wait until I get
>all silly from the lack of sleep.
Where's my violin?
Dana
Bitch 16 Wench 22 BS 23 BOTY VI ret.
'05 FLHRSI "Belle"
'03 FLHTCUI
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778377 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:56 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:48:59 GMT, "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>Schmoe wrote:
>> <shaking head> Come on now, Defenders of the Boo. Read that post
>> above! It's a beaut! She doesn't know anything about Tinman but feels
>> comfortable giving him marital advice and implying that he would be
>> unfaithful to his bride with her "daughter". DP? Dana? Anyone? <g>
>>
>> Shirley, an order please! (no not you) I think we've all had a little
>> (very little) to ponder in this pretty little thread so I'm putting
>> the card on the bar, lining up 40 shot glasses filled with Patron
>> Silver and asking that we all mosey up, shoot a coupla of 'em down
>> and share a group hug. Afterward, maybe Roach can serenade us with
>> some nice Hawaiian melodies.
>
>I'm thinking a few country tunes in a biker bar in Altoona
>would be more appropriate.
What was the name of that place again .. the Post .. the Scratchin
Post .. the Whippin Post .. the Hitchin Post .. I'm sure we can find
the place and stumble in again.
--
CurlyMan "Chronically Late" PH#15 SLOB#1 BS#264 DOF#(absolutely)
100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
Temporary member of everyday is Saturday club ... again.
*Fuck Off to e-mail me.*
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778378 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 06:57 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:41:59 GMT, "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>Beckyboo wrote:
>> Tinman wrote:
>>> And, I might add, *I* ended it on a good note. (Well, assuming she
>>> knows I wuz joking, am actually married, and couldn't possibly get
>>> involved with her daughter.)
>>
>> While I was joking about you meeting Becky, just one more note here
>> for you, why would I memorize your vitals or your posts? You are
>> famous?
>>
>> In looking back now, I see that you got in trouble with someone with
>> an"i" at the end of their name not too long ago either. If you were so
>> joking why would you post a link to your website or picture for Becky
>> to see? Now I am going to shut up for a good long time, but you should
>> watch your marriage, and cherish it.
>>
>> And, I think you left out more of your Candi story than I left out of
>> mine but I don't see anyone jumping all over you for that.... so yep,
>> there's a double standard for sure, but it works both ways.
>
>Oh My God! It's INITA!
EWWWWWWWW!!!!
--
CurlyMan "Chronically Late" PH#15 SLOB#1 BS#264 DOF#(absolutely)
100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
Temporary member of everyday is Saturday club ... again.
*Fuck Off to e-mail me.*
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778380 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 07:04 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:58:52 GMT, "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>"Chilly" <wjghouse [at] nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns97FE939E194BChillyspewage [at] 69.28.186.121...
>> "roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> sed:
>>
>> > "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>> >
>> > >I'm not expecting anyone to answer that, but damned, did that ever
>> > >bite her in the ass.
>> >
>> > Can't argue with that.
>>
>> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even Schmoe'll
>> share a bottle with her.
>
>Ya mean like certain netscum shared a bottle with Kathy in
>Wildwood one year?
I know not concerning that of which you speak ... *cough* *cough*
er .. by the way there is a rumor that there were pictures ...
--
CurlyMan "Chronically Late" PH#15 SLOB#1 BS#264 DOF#(absolutely)
100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
Temporary member of everyday is Saturday club ... again.
*Fuck Off to e-mail me.*
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778383 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 07:10 |
|
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:53:02 GMT, "TL Mitchell"
<tlmitchell99(MyJohnson) [at] earthlink.net> wrote:
>Mob intervention at it's finest! Next time we need torches.......
a tree, and some good rope, too.
--
CurlyMan "Chronically Late" PH#15 SLOB#1 BS#264 DOF#(absolutely)
100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
Temporary member of everyday is Saturday club ... again.
*Fuck Off to e-mail me.*
|
|
|
| Re: Change to thevirtualbarandgrill (Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this ismy story and I'm sticking to it...) [message #778393 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 08:50 |
|
On 2006-07-12 20:28:41 -0700, DM at work <fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> said:
> Michael Hewitt wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> ..-. -.-- -.-- ..-. ..-.
>>>
>
>> And I just copied that shit from a friend <sfsf>
>>
>
> Oh, sure. NOW I'm your friend. Yas shoulda heard what Al and I said
> 'bout ya over steaks tonight.
>
> Fins BS#221
Like I really give a shit ...
Oh ... I suppose I should add [sfsf]
Or in Al's case ... maybe not.
--
Grumpy
Babe v2.1 2000 FLSTC
DOF -2, BS 193, CVNS G&W, Cult of Mac
"*Ploink* the clueless!" ..-. -.-- -.-- ..-. ..-.
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778396 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 09:38 |
|
"roach" <roach [at] nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:H0etg.6818$ye3.4211 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>
> Beckyboo wrote:
>> Tinman wrote:
>>> And, I might add, *I* ended it on a good note. (Well, assuming she
>>> knows I wuz joking, am actually married, and couldn't possibly get
>>> involved with her daughter.)
>>
>> While I was joking about you meeting Becky, just one more note here
>> for you, why would I memorize your vitals or your posts? You are
>> famous?
>>
>> In looking back now, I see that you got in trouble with someone with
>> an"i" at the end of their name not too long ago either. If you were so
>> joking why would you post a link to your website or picture for Becky
>> to see? Now I am going to shut up for a good long time, but you should
>> watch your marriage, and cherish it.
>>
>> And, I think you left out more of your Candi story than I left out of
>> mine but I don't see anyone jumping all over you for that.... so yep,
>> there's a double standard for sure, but it works both ways.
>
> Oh My God! It's INITA!
>
> --
> "but I don't mean that in a bad sort of a way"
> Roach AH#123, A Hoodlum© Asshole(tm)
Oh my goodness!...not here that often...and thought the same thing!!!
Marilyn <appreciating the diversion..from whatever>
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778408 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 13:56 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:48:07 GMT, "Tud" <tud333 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Now don't go and be like that, you know that's how these things go,
>> and in a day or two a majority of us will forget it, or at least let
>> it go
>
> Don't count on it.
Let it fester then, no skin of my nose.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778409 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:07 |
|
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tud wrote:
>> big al wrote:
>>> Cuckoo wrote:
>>>
>>>> I sure dunno if Becky/Boo/Shirley is a troll or not, but I know one
>>>> thing...she sure has the regulars fightin'.
>>>> Damn.
>>>> Isn't that what trolls do?
>>>> /me walks away shaking head
>>>> Kelli
>>>> '96FXDzebra
>>>> BS#261/SLOB#17
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Fighting? This ain't fighting... I thought you owned a bar.
>>
>> Simply a little spirited discussion s'all.
>>
>
> Are you still working?
When I posted that I had been home for about 3 hours and working from there,
hadn't gone to sleep yet, so it would have been after 38 hours of no sleep,
what would make you ask? <g>
You got your violin handy Dana?
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778413 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:29 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:36:39 -0700, big al <bs205 [at] NOSPAMyahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Gimme a fuckin' break Dana. This person has lied about herself,
>> made up idiotic stories about herself, imaginary relatives and
>> friends (dead or alive) since the day she dropped through the door.
>> Posted links to pics of other people's family on the net. Ugly?
>> That's ugly. And totally uncalled for. Has anyone here bullshitted
>> her about who they are? hasn't everyone offered her the benefit of
>> the doubt? Even to the extent of inviting her to stay at their
>> place like you have? Stand back and take a look at what's
>> transpired. We're not the uglies you make us out to be.
>
> And just what exactly is your investment in this relationship other
> than a couple of hours behind your keyboard? You guys (and I mean this
> in general, not you specifically) don't seem to mind that Panhead
> changes his name 12 times a day and lies through his teeth constantly.
And I'm sure a few more years of Becky/Shirley/whoever's bullshit and she'll
be sufficiently killfiled and ignored to the status the Panhead enjoys
today.
> And not just Panhead, many of our other resident Trolls as well.
See above.
> What
> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because they
> got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story and are
> embarassed about it.
I see a bunch of guys that were fed a load of shit, found out it was a load
of shit, and are now calling the liar out. Nothing arrogant about it.
> Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
> chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
LOL, if that's what you think it's about then you've got your own problems
to deal with. I called her full of shit right after she posted that picture
and haven't replied much to her since this thread. I suspect back then that
she wasn't on the level, then this thread proved it, and now she's getting
what she asked for when she started spnning her bogus tale.
> Now you find out you may not and
> are running around screaming "injustice!" and pissing on your own
> feet. To what lengths would you go to find out where personal effects
> were that had been stolen from you by some dirtbag? Personal effects
> that were stolen from your dead sister? Anyone here would have done
> exactly the same thing in the same situation.
Sure, but I wouldn't whine about how I was treated by the people I lied to
after the fact.
> Don't believe that was
> the situation? Big deal. You have NO personal investment in any of
> this, as far as I can tell. NONE OF IT MATTERS. Her checks to Eddie
> didn't bounce, that's the only thing that matters.
Good for her (sincerely), but is that all it takes to buy you? Should I
send a check to Eddie and show up at your place in September?
> And who I invite to
> my house is *my* business. If Shirley shows up here in September, I'll
> check her out. If she doesn't, I won't. I'm certainly not going to
> fret about it between now and then. Life is way too short to be as
> pissed off about this as you all are. Threatening to gang rape
> someone's daughter is too far below even RMH for me to imagine.
There was no threat. She was enticing members of the group, a VERY PUBLIC
group (who knows what kind of lurkers we have) with her 26 year old
daughter, I figured I'd suggest a way she could speed up the end that result
she seemed to be after.
One of you're posts indicated that you're not going to let it go, that's
fine by me. As you've said, I've got no personal investment (apparently you
feel that you do), it's just a matter of a few keystrokes to keep this
going. Will it end me up in a few killfiles? Probably. Don't really care
one way or the other. It's a brand new day for me, shall we proceed?
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778415 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:52 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> What
> I see is a bunch of arrogant blowhards woof woof woofing because they
> got taken in by 3 blondes with a slightly embellished story and are
> embarassed about it. Did any of you honestly think that you had a real
> chance with a beautiful 26 year old?
That is a foolish insult that should be below you. It's beyond a specific
response.
> Anyone here would have done
> exactly the same thing in the same situation.
Speak for yourself.
>You have NO personal investment in any of
> this, as far as I can tell.
No one does which gives you as much right to respond to her as anyone else.
In usenet, you don't actually need a personal investment to respond to a
thread (started by BeckyBoo).
> And who I invite to
> my house is *my* business.
That's the 2nd time you've mentioned that. Did someone question this
obvious. inalienable right?
>If Shirley shows up here in September, I'll
> check her out.
<insert Jojo joke here> (sorry, I couldn't resist, devil made me...)
> Life is way too short to be as
> pissed off about this as you all are.
Not even a teency, weency bit.
>Threatening to gang rape someone's daughter is too far below even RMH for
>me to imagine.
Wow, now that's a completely over the top description of Tud's joke. Do you
actually believe this?
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778416 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:53 |
|
Dana Taramina wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:49:50 -0700, DM at work
> <fins99 [at] no_spamhotmail.com> wrote:
>> I've stayed out of this thread, but I just gotta ask. Why are you
>> keeping tabs?
> So I can refine my guest list for September.
3
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778417 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:56 |
|
CurlyMan Hoodlum© wrote:
>>> Nah, this'll all blow over by then and I'll bet a quarter even
>>> Schmoe'll share a bottle with her.
Roach wrote
>> Ya mean like certain netscum shared a bottle with Kathy in
>> Wildwood one year?
CurlyMan Hoodlum spoke
> I know not concerning that of which you speak ... *cough* *cough*
>
> er .. by the way there is a rumor that there were pictures ...
<choke> What happens in Wildwood...
....talk about NOS. <sfsf>
|
|
|
| Re: Intro, Re-Intro, this is my story and I'm sticking to it... [message #778418 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:03 |
|
Schmoe wrote:
> Dana Taramina wrote:
>> Life is way too short to be as
>> pissed off about this as you all are.
>
> Not even a teency, weency bit.
That does seem to be a major misconception. It would take a lot more than
some anonymous troll to get my ire up, but poking said troll can certainly
be good for some laughs. It's a sport that goes waaay back in here. The
only ones I've seen get pissed off are Becky's defenders, well, probably not
Roach or dp, disappointed by some self imposed line being crossed perhaps,
but not pissed off.
Well I guess any chance of scoring with Shriley's kids has long since
passed.
--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Tue Jan 6 05:26:17 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.20309 Sekunden |
